DX v Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS) and Tesorería General de la Seguridad Social.

JurisdictionEuropean Union
Celex Number62022CJ0113
ECLIECLI:EU:C:2023:665
Date14 September 2023
Docket NumberC-113/22
CourtCourt of Justice (European Union)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
4 cases
  • EA v Artemis security SAS.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 20 Junio 2024
    ...y otros, C‑295/04 a C‑298/04, EU:C:2006:461, apartado 95, y de 14 de septiembre de 2023, TGSS (Denegación del complemento por maternidad), C‑113/22, EU:C:2023:665, apartado 50 y jurisprudencia citada]. 33 En efecto, el derecho del trabajador a reclamar una reparación por daños y perjuicios ......
  • Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 8 February 2024.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 8 Febrero 2024
    ...una risposta utile al giudice del rinvio. V., per tutte, sentenza del 14 settembre 2023, TGSS (Rifiuto dell’integrazione per maternità) (C‑113/22, EU:C:2023:665), punti 30 e 19 La domanda di pronuncia pregiudiziale rinvia espressamente, a tal riguardo, alle valutazioni dei giudici nazionali......
  • Conclusiones del Abogado General Sr. M. Campos Sánchez-Bordona, presentadas el 13 de junio de 2024.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 13 Junio 2024
    ...Gericht eine zweckdienliche Antwort zu geben. Vgl. u. a. Urteil vom 14. September 2023, TGSS (Verweigerung der Mutterschaftszulage) (C‑113/22, EU:C:2023:665, Rn. 30 und Edición provisional CONCLUSIONES DEL ABOGADO GENERAL M. CAMPOS SÁNCHEZ-BORDONA presentadas el 13 de junio de 2024 (1) Asun......
  • Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 30 April 2024.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 30 Abril 2024
    ...répondre de façon utile à la juridiction de renvoi. Voir, notamment, arrêt du 14 septembre 2023, TGSS (Refus du complément de maternité) (C‑113/22, EU:C:2023:665, points 30 et 14 Dans la décision de renvoi (point 2.1.), la juridiction de renvoi affirme que, en ce qui concerne l’objet du lit......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT