DX v Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS) and Tesorería General de la Seguridad Social.

JurisdictionEuropean Union
CourtCourt of Justice (European Union)
ECLIECLI:EU:C:2023:665
Docket NumberC-113/22
Date14 September 2023

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
5 cases
  • Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 8 February 2024.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 8 February 2024
    ...una risposta utile al giudice del rinvio. V., per tutte, sentenza del 14 settembre 2023, TGSS (Rifiuto dell’integrazione per maternità) (C‑113/22, EU:C:2023:665), punti 30 e 19 La domanda di pronuncia pregiudiziale rinvia espressamente, a tal riguardo, alle valutazioni dei giudici nazionali......
  • Conclusiones del Abogado General Sr. M. Campos Sánchez-Bordona, presentadas el 13 de junio de 2024.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 13 June 2024
    ...Gericht eine zweckdienliche Antwort zu geben. Vgl. u. a. Urteil vom 14. September 2023, TGSS (Verweigerung der Mutterschaftszulage) (C‑113/22, EU:C:2023:665, Rn. 30 und Edición provisional CONCLUSIONES DEL ABOGADO GENERAL M. CAMPOS SÁNCHEZ-BORDONA presentadas el 13 de junio de 2024 (1) Asun......
  • Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 30 April 2024.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 30 April 2024
    ...répondre de façon utile à la juridiction de renvoi. Voir, notamment, arrêt du 14 septembre 2023, TGSS (Refus du complément de maternité) (C‑113/22, EU:C:2023:665, points 30 et 14 Dans la décision de renvoi (point 2.1.), la juridiction de renvoi affirme que, en ce qui concerne l’objet du lit......
  • UV and XXX v Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS).
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 15 May 2025
    ...las personas incluidas en la otra categoría [sentencia de 14 de septiembre de 2023, TGSS (Denegación del complemento por maternidad), C‑113/22, EU:C:2023:665, apartado 41 y jurisprudencia 88 En el caso de autos, si, por lo que respecta al complemento de pensión controvertido, la aplicación ......
  • Get Started for Free