Judgment of the General Court Third Chamber, Extended Composition of 6 October 2021, Aeris Invest v ECB, T-827/17

Date06 October 2021
Year2021
7
Rights of the European Union,
7
preclude rules on criminal sanctions such as those laid down in
Finnish law in connection with the crossing of the national border without a valid iden tity card or
passport.
In that regard, it observes that, while it is open to the Member States to impose a fine in order to
penalise a failure to comply with a formal requirement relating to the exercise of a right conferred by
EU law, that sanction must be proportionate to the gravity of the infringement. Where, as in the
present case, the obligation to be in possession of a valid identity card or pa ssport is disregarded by a
beneficiary of the right to freedom of movement who possesses such a document but has merely
failed to carry it when travelling, it is a minor offence. Therefore, a heavy financial penalty, such as a
fine of 20% of the offender’s average net monthly income, is not proportionate to the seriousness of
that offence.
III. INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS: ACCESS TO DOCUMENTS
Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition ) of 6 October 2021,
Aeris Invest v ECB, T-827/17
Access to documents Decision 2004/258/EC Documents concerning the adoption of a resolution
scheme for Banco Popular Español Partial refusal of access Exception relating to the protection of the
confidentiality of the proceedings of the ECB’s decision-making bodies Documents reflecting the
outcome of the proceedings of the ECB’s decision-making bodies Obligation to state reasons Exception
relating to the protection of the financial, monetary or economic policy of the European Union or of a
Member State Exception relating to the protection of the stability of the financial system in the
European Union or in a Member State Exception relating to the protection of the confidentiality of
information that is protected as such under EU law Concept of ‘confidential information’ – General
presumption of confidentiality Exemptions from the obligation of professional secrecy Article 47 of the
Charter of Fundamental Rights
The applicant, Aeris Invest Sàrl, held shares in Banco Popular Español, SA (‘Banco Popular’), a credit
institution established in Spain which was subject to direct prudential supervision by the European
Central Bank (ECB).
8
On 6 June 2017, the ECB, after consulting the Single Resolution Board (SRB),
carried out an assessment regarding whether Banco Popular was failing or was likely to fail.
9
That
same day, Banco Popular’s board of directors informed the ECB that it had reached the conclusion
that the bank was likely to fail. On 7 June 2017, the SRB adopted a decision concerning a resolution
7
Article 49(3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
8
Pursuant to Council Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 of 15 October 2 013 conferring specific tasks on the ECB concerning policies relating to the
prudential supervision of credit institutions (OJ 2013 L 287, p. 63).
9
In accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 18 (1) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council
of 15 July 2014 establishing uniform rule s and a uniform procedure for the resolution of credi t institutions and ce rtain investment firms in
the framework of a Single Resolution Mechanism and a Single Resolution Fund and amending Regulation (EU) N o 1093/2010 (OJ 2014 L 225,
p. 1).

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT