Judgment of the General Court Third Chamber, Extended Composition of 6 October 2021, Aeris Invest v ECB, T-827/17
Date | 06 October 2021 |
Year | 2021 |
7
Rights of the European Union,
7
preclude rules on criminal sanctions such as those laid down in
Finnish law in connection with the crossing of the national border without a valid iden tity card or
passport.
In that regard, it observes that, while it is open to the Member States to impose a fine in order to
penalise a failure to comply with a formal requirement relating to the exercise of a right conferred by
EU law, that sanction must be proportionate to the gravity of the infringement. Where, as in the
present case, the obligation to be in possession of a valid identity card or pa ssport is disregarded by a
beneficiary of the right to freedom of movement who possesses such a document but has merely
failed to carry it when travelling, it is a minor offence. Therefore, a heavy financial penalty, such as a
fine of 20% of the offender’s average net monthly income, is not proportionate to the seriousness of
that offence.
III. INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS: ACCESS TO DOCUMENTS
Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition ) of 6 October 2021,
Aeris Invest v ECB, T-827/17
Access to documents – Decision 2004/258/EC – Documents concerning the adoption of a resolution
scheme for Banco Popular Español – Partial refusal of access – Exception relating to the protection of the
confidentiality of the proceedings of the ECB’s decision-making bodies – Documents reflecting the
outcome of the proceedings of the ECB’s decision-making bodies –Obligation to state reasons – Exception
relating to the protection of the financial, monetary or economic policy of the European Union or of a
Member State – Exception relating to the protection of the stability of the financial system in the
European Union or in a Member State – Exception relating to the protection of the confidentiality of
information that is protected as such under EU law – Concept of ‘confidential information’ – General
presumption of confidentiality – Exemptions from the obligation of professional secrecy – Article 47 of the
Charter of Fundamental Rights
The applicant, Aeris Invest Sàrl, held shares in Banco Popular Español, SA (‘Banco Popular’), a credit
institution established in Spain which was subject to direct prudential supervision by the European
Central Bank (ECB).
8
On 6 June 2017, the ECB, after consulting the Single Resolution Board (SRB),
carried out an assessment regarding whether Banco Popular was failing or was likely to fail.
9
That
same day, Banco Popular’s board of directors informed the ECB that it had reached the conclusion
that the bank was likely to fail. On 7 June 2017, the SRB adopted a decision concerning a resolution
7
Article 49(3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
8
Pursuant to Council Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 of 15 October 2 013 conferring specific tasks on the ECB concerning policies relating to the
prudential supervision of credit institutions (OJ 2013 L 287, p. 63).
9
In accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 18 (1) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council
of 15 July 2014 establishing uniform rule s and a uniform procedure for the resolution of credi t institutions and ce rtain investment firms in
the framework of a Single Resolution Mechanism and a Single Resolution Fund and amending Regulation (EU) N o 1093/2010 (OJ 2014 L 225,
p. 1).
To continue reading
Request your trial