M.F. v J.M.
| Jurisdiction | European Union |
| Celex Number | 62019CJ0508 |
| ECLI | ECLI:EU:C:2022:201 |
| Date | 22 March 2022 |
| Docket Number | C-508/19 |
| Court | Court of Justice (European Union) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
21 cases
-
Virgilijus Valančius v Lietuvos Republikos Vyriausybė.
...Gerichtshofs nach Art. 267 AEUV fällt (Urteil vom 22. März 2022, Prokurator Generalny [Disziplinarkammer des Obersten Gerichts – Ernennung], C‑508/19, EU:C:2022:201, Rn. 57 und die dort angeführte 32 In diesem Kontext spielt es keine Rolle, dass die Beschlüsse über Ernennungen von Richtern ......
-
Opinion of Advocate General Medina delivered on 12 December 2024.
...jurisprudence citée). Voir, également, arrêt du 22 mars 2022, Prokurator Generalny (Chambre disciplinaire de la Cour suprême – Nomination) (C‑508/19, EU:C:2022:201, points 60 et 61 ainsi que jurisprudence 8 Voir, par exemple, arrêt du 13 avril 2000, Lehtonen et Castors Braine (C‑176/96, EU:......
-
Kolin Inşaat Turizm Sanayi ve Ticaret AȘ v Državna komisija za kontrolu postupaka javne nabave.
...zu überprüfen (vgl. in diesem Sinne Urteil vom 22. März 2022, Prokurator Generalny [Disziplinarkammer des Obersten Gerichts – Ernennung], C‑508/19, EU:C:2022:201, Rn. 59 und die dort angeführte 38 Der Gerichtshof kann sich insbesondere veranlasst sehen, zu prüfen, ob die Bestimmungen des Un......
-
Opinion of Advocate General Pikamäe delivered on 26 October 2023.
...diciembre de 2001 3 Sentencia de 22 de marzo de 2022, Prokurator Generalny y otros (Sala Disciplinaria del Tribunal Supremo — Nombramiento) (C‑508/19, EU:C:2022:201), apartado 4 Véase, en este sentido, la sentencia de 19 de noviembre de 2019, A. K. y otros (Independencia de la Sala Discipli......
Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
-
Poder judicial nacional y primacía del Derecho de la Unión. A propósito de la sentencia del Tribunal constitucional de Polonia K 3/21
...a C754/19, apartado 36; STJUE, de 22 de marzo de 2022, Prokurator Generalny (Chambre disciplinaire de la Cour suprême - Nomination), asunto C-508/19, apartado 56 y STJUE, de 29 de marzo de 2022, Getin Noble Bank, asunto C-132/20, apartado 88. En idéntico sentido en aquellas sentencias sobre......
-
Estado de derecho e independencia judicial en la jurisprudencia del Tribunal de Justicia de la UE: la consagración de la identidad constitucional europea
...C-430/21, ECLI:EU:C:2022:99. Sentencia TJUE. (2022). Prokurator Generalny (Chambre disciplinaire de la Cour suprême - Nomination), C-508/19. ECLI:EU:C:2022:201. Sentencia TJUE. (2022). Getin Noble Bank, C-132/20. ECLI:EUC:2022:235. b) Jurisprudencia del TJUE relativa a la Orden de Detención......
-
Judgment of the Court of Justice Grand Chamber, 9 January 2024, G. and Others Appointment of judges of the ordinary courts in Poland, C-181/21 and C-269/21
...European Union. 6 Judgment of 22 March 2022, Prokurator Generalny (Disciplinary Chamber of the Supreme Court – Appointment) (C-508/19, EU:C:2022:201, paragraph 62 and the case-law it, the referring court does not, however, put forward any provision of Polish procedural law which would confe......