H. J. Glawe Spiel- und Unterhaltungsgeräte Aufstellungsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG v Finanzamt Hamburg-Barmbek-Uhlenhorst.

JurisdictionEuropean Union
Celex Number61993CJ0038
ECLIECLI:EU:C:1994:188
Docket NumberC-38/93
CourtCourt of Justice (European Union)
Procedure TypeReference for a preliminary ruling
Date05 May 1994
EUR-Lex - 61993J0038 - EN 61993J0038

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 5 May 1994. - H. J. Glawe Spiel- und Unterhaltungsgeräte Aufstellungsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG v Finanzamt Hamburg-Barmbek-Uhlenhorst. - Reference for a preliminary ruling: Finanzgericht Hamburg - Germany. - VAT - Sixth directive - Slot machines - Taxable amount. - Case C-38/93.

European Court reports 1994 Page I-01679


Summary
Parties
Grounds
Decision on costs
Operative part

Keywords

++++

Tax provisions ° Harmonization of laws ° Turnover taxes ° Common system of value added tax ° Taxable amount ° Provision of services ° Consideration actually received by the provider of services ° Slot machines ° Exclusion of the fixed proportion of the stakes compulsorily paid out to players in the form of winnings

(Council Directive 77/388, Art. 11 A(1)(a))

Summary

The taxable amount in respect of a provision of services within the meaning of Article 11 A(1)(a) of the Sixth Directive 77/388 consists of the consideration actually received in return for the service provided. In the case of gaming machines offering a chance of winning (slot machines) which, pursuant to mandatory statutory requirements, are set in such a way that they pay out as winnings a certain percentage of the stakes inserted, the consideration actually received by the operator in return for making the machines available consists only of the proportion of the stakes which he can actually take for himself.

Consequently, the aforementioned provision must be interpreted as meaning that the taxable amount in respect of such machines does not include the statutorily prescribed proportion of the total stakes inserted which corresponds to the winnings paid out to the players.

Parties

In Case C-38/93,

REFERENCE to the Court under Article 177 of the EEC Treaty by the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Federal Republic of Germany) for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that court between

H.J. Glawe Spiel- und Unterhaltungsgeraete Aufstellungsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG

and

Finanzamt Hamburg-Barmbek-Uhlenhorst

on the interpretation of Article 11 A(1)(a) and Article 11 A(3)(b) of the Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonization of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes - Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1),

THE COURT (Sixth Chamber),

composed of: G.F. Mancini, President of the Chamber, M. Díez de Velasco, C.N. Kakouris, F.A. Schockweiler (Rapporteur) and P.J.G. Kapteyn, Judges,

Advocate General: F.G. Jacobs,

Registrar: H.A. Ruehl, Principal Administrator,

after considering the written observations submitted on behalf of:

- H.J. Glawe Spiel- und...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
17 cases
  • Astra Zeneca UK Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 22 Abril 2010
    ...à la note en bas de page précédente, arrêts du 27 mars 1990, Boots Company (C‑126/88, Rec. p. I‑1235, point 19), et du 5 mai 1994, Glawe (C‑38/93, Rec. p. I‑1679, point 8). 16 – Voir arrêts du 8 mars 1988, Apple and Pear Development Council (102/86, Rec. p. 1443, point 12), et du 16 octobre......
  • Finanzamt Gladbeck v Edith Linneweber (C-453/02) and Finanzamt Herne-West v Savvas Akritidis (C-462/02).
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 8 Julio 2004
    ...Sr. Jacobs en el punto 10 de sus conclusiones de 3 de marzo de 1994 en el asunto en que recayó la sentencia de 5 de mayo de 1994, Glawe (C‑38/93, Rec. p. I‑1679). 13 – Véase a ese respecto lo que expuse en los puntos 68 a 74 de las conclusiones presentadas en el asunto en que recayó la sent......
  • Commission of the European Communities v French Republic.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 13 Abril 2000
    ...industrial. 68 En apoyo de este análisis, el Gobierno francés cita un pasaje de las observaciones de la Comisión en el nuevo asunto Renault, C-38/93, antes citado, actualmente pendiente ante el Tribunal de Justicia, que, en su opinión, recoge lo esencial del fallo de la sentencia del Tribun......
  • Finanzamt Gladbeck v Edith Linneweber (C-453/02) and Finanzamt Herne-West v Savvas Akritidis (C-462/02).
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 17 Febrero 2005
    ...alegó que el comportamiento observado por la Comisión de las Comunidades Europeas posteriormente a la sentencia de 5 de mayo de 1994, Glawe (C‑38/93, Rec. p. I‑1679), había llevado a la Federal de Alemania a considerar que el artículo 4, apartado 9, de la UStG era conforme con la Sexta Dire......
  • Get Started for Free