GB-INNO-BM v Confédération du commerce luxembourgeois.

JurisdictionEuropean Union
CourtCourt of Justice (European Union)
Writing for the CourtKoopmans
ECLIECLI:EU:C:1990:102
Docket NumberC-362/88
Date07 March 1990
Procedure TypeReference for a preliminary ruling
EUR-Lex - 61988J0362 - EN 61988J0362

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 March 1990. - GB-INNO-BM v Confédération du commerce luxembourgeois. - Reference for a preliminary ruling: Cour de cassation - Grand-Duchy de Luxembourg. - Free movement of goods - National prohibition on publication of the duration of a special offer or the price previously charged. - Case C-362/88.

European Court reports 1990 Page I-00667
Swedish special edition Page 00349
Finnish special edition Page 00367


Summary
Parties
Grounds
Decision on costs
Operative part

Keywords

++++

1 . Free movement of goods - Quantitative restrictions - Measures having equivalent effect - Concept - Restrictions on cross-frontier advertising

( EEC Treaty, Arts 30, 31 and 36 )

2 . Free movement of goods - Quantitative restrictions - Measures having equivalent effect - Prohibition against referring, in advertisements for a special purchase offer, to the duration of the offer or the price previously charged - Application to advertising lawfully distributed in another Member State - Not permissible - Justification - Consumer protection - Not justifiable

( EEC Treaty, Arts 30 and 36 )

Summary

1 . Legislation which restricts or prohibits certain forms of advertising and certain means of sales promotion may, although it does not directly affect trade, be such as to restrict the volume of trade because it affects marketing opportunities .

Free movement of goods concerns not only traders but also individuals . it requires, particularly in frontier areas, that consumers resident in one Member State may travel freely to the territory of another Member State to shop under the same conditions as the local population . That freedom for consumers is compromised if they are deprived of access to advertising available in the country where purchases are made . Consequently a prohibition against distributing such advertising must be examined in the light of Articles 30, 31 and 36 of the EEC Treaty .

2 . Under Articles 30 and 36 of the Treaty, advertising lawfully distributed in another Member State cannot be made subject to national legislation prohibiting the inclusion, in advertisements relating to a special purchase offer, of a statement showing the duration of the offer or the previous price .

Since Community law regards the provision of information to the consumer as one of the principal requirements with regard to consumer protection, Article 30 of the Treaty cannot be interpreted as meaning that national legislation which denies the consumer access to certain kinds of information may be justified by mandatory requirements concerning consumer protection .

Parties

In Case C-362/88

REFERENCE to the Court under Article 177 of the EEC Treaty by the Cour de cassation of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that court between

GB-INNO-BM, a company incorporated under Belgian law, Brussels,

and

Confédération du commerce luxembourgeois, a non-profit-making association established in Luxembourg,

on the interpretation of Articles 30 and 36 of the EEC Treaty,

THE COURT ( Sixth Chamber )

composed of : C . N . Kakouris, President of Chamber, T . Koopmans, G . F . Mancini, T . F . O' Higgins and M . Diez de Velasco, Judges,

Advocate General : C . O . Lenz

Registrar : D . Louterman, Principal Administrator

after considering the observations submitted on behalf of

GB-INNO-BM, a company incorporated under Belgian law, the appellant, by Nicolas Decker, of the Luxembourg Bar, Antoine de Bruyn, avocat with the right to appear before the Belgian Cour de cassation, and Louis van Bunnen and Michel Mahieu, of the Brussels Bar,

Confédération du commerce luxembourgeois ASBL, the respondent, by Yvette Hamilius, of the Luxembourg Bar,

the Government of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg by Alain Gross, of the...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
29 cases
  • European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 10 July 2014
    ...de información de los consumidores y de comparación de precios. 53 El Reino de Bélgica aduce que, además, en su sentencia GB-INNO-BM (C‑362/88, EU:C:1990:102), el Tribunal de Justicia erigió en principio el derecho a la información del consumidor, de modo que, en realidad, los artículos 20,......
  • Österreichische Unilever GmbH v Smithkline Beecham Markenartikel GmbH.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 2 July 1998
    ...in Case 286/81 Oosthoek's Uitgevermaatschappij [1982] ECR 4575, paragraph 15; Case 382/87 Buet and Others [1989] ECR 1235, paragraph 7; Case C-362/88 INNO [1990] ECR I-667, paragraph 7; Joined Cases C-1/90 and C-176/90 Aragonesa de Publicidad Exterior and Publivía [1991] ECR I-4151, paragra......
  • Procesos penales contra Tankstation 't Heukske vof y J. B. E. Boermans.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 16 March 1994
    ...interdisant ou restreignant, sans distinction, des formes de publicité, on peut, par exemple, citer les arrêts du 7 mars 1990, GB-INNO-BM, C-362/88, Rec. p. I-667 (interdiction de mentionner le prix antérieur à une promotion); du 12 décembre 1990, SARPP, C-241/89, Rec. p. I-4695 (interdicti......
  • Società italiana petroli SpA (IP) contra Borsana Srl.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 17 December 1998
    ...Derecho comunitario y, en particular, el principio de proporcionalidad (véase, en este sentido, la sentencia de 10 de julio de 1990, Hansen, C-362/88, Rec. p. I-2911, apartados 17 a 19). 49 Sobre este particular, debe destacarse que al adoptar medidas como la fijación de un plazo para la ad......
  • Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles