Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain.
| Jurisdiction | European Union |
| Court | Court of Justice (European Union) |
| Writing for the Court | Tizzano |
| ECLI | ECLI:EU:C:2008:64 |
| Date | 31 January 2008 |
| Docket Number | C-32/07 |
| Procedure Type | Recurso por incumplimiento |
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 31 January 2008 – Commission v Spain
(Case C‑32/07)
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Directive 2001/84/EC – Copyright – Resale right for the benefit of the author of an original work of art
Actions for failure to fulfil obligations – Examination of the merits by the Court – Situation to be taken into consideration – Situation on expiry of the period laid down in the reasoned opinion (Art. 226 EC) (see para. 10)
Re:
| Failure of a Member State to fulfil |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
2 cases
-
Xellia Pharmaceuticals ApS and Alpharma, LLC, anciennement Zoetis Products LLC v European Commission.
...questione nella causa che ha dato luogo alla sentenza del 20 novembre 2008, Beef Industry Development Society e Barry Brothers (C‑209/07, EU:C:2008:64), si deve considerare che il Tribunale non sia incorso in alcun errore di diritto quando ha concluso che l’accordo controverso rientrava nel......
-
Generics (UK) Ltd and Others v Competition and Markets Authority.
...«restrizione per oggetto». (v., in tal senso, sentenza del 20 novembre 2008, Beef Industry Development Society e Barry Brothers, C‑209/07, EU:C:2008:64, punto 34). 84 Ciò premesso, è certamente possibile che un produttore di medicinali generici che si trovi nella situazione prevista dal giu......