Your World of Legal Intelligence
 European Union | 1-800-335-6202

Peter Pammer v Reederei Karl Schlüter GmbH & Co. KG (C-585/08) and Hotel Alpenhof GesmbH v Oliver Heller (C-144/09).

Judgment Cited authorities 64 Cited in 3 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
JurisdictionEuropean Union
ECLIECLI:EU:C:2010:273
Docket NumberC-144/09,C-585/08
Celex Number62008CC0585
CourtCourt of Justice (European Union)
Procedure TypeReference for a preliminary ruling
Date18 May 2010
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 practice notes
  • Peter Pammer v Reederei Karl Schlüter GmbH & Co. KG (C-585/08) and Hotel Alpenhof GesmbH v Oliver Heller (C-144/09).
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 7 December 2010
    ...jointes C-585/08 et C-144/09 Peter Pammer contre Reederei Karl Schlüter GmbH & Co. KG etHotel Alpenhof GesmbHcontreOliver Heller (demandes de décision préjudicielle, introduites par l'Oberster Gerichtshof) «Compétence judiciaire en matière civile et commerciale — Règlement (CE) nº 44/200......
  • Pez Hejduk v EnergieAgentur.NRW GmbH.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 22 January 2015
    ...Court’s case-law that, unlike Article 15(1)(c) of Regulation No 44/2001, which was interpreted in the judgment in Pammer and Hotel Alpenhof (C‑585/08 and C‑144/09, EU:C:2010:740), Article 5(3) does not require, in particular, that the activity concerned be ‘directed to’ the Member State in ......
2 cases
  • Peter Pammer v Reederei Karl Schlüter GmbH & Co. KG (C-585/08) and Hotel Alpenhof GesmbH v Oliver Heller (C-144/09).
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 7 December 2010
    ...jointes C-585/08 et C-144/09 Peter Pammer contre Reederei Karl Schlüter GmbH & Co. KG etHotel Alpenhof GesmbHcontreOliver Heller (demandes de décision préjudicielle, introduites par l'Oberster Gerichtshof) «Compétence judiciaire en matière civile et commerciale — Règlement (CE) nº 44/200......
  • Pez Hejduk v EnergieAgentur.NRW GmbH.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 22 January 2015
    ...Court’s case-law that, unlike Article 15(1)(c) of Regulation No 44/2001, which was interpreted in the judgment in Pammer and Hotel Alpenhof (C‑585/08 and C‑144/09, EU:C:2010:740), Article 5(3) does not require, in particular, that the activity concerned be ‘directed to’ the Member State in ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT