Parlamento Europeo contra Consejo de las Comunidades Europeas.

JurisdictionEuropean Union
Celex Number61990CJ0295
ECLIECLI:EU:C:1992:294
Date07 July 1992
Docket NumberC-295/90
Procedure TypeRecours en annulation - fondé
CourtCourt of Justice (European Union)
61990J0295

Judgment of the Court of 7 July 1992. - European Parliament v Council of the European Communities. - Directive 90/366/EEC on the right of residence for students - Legal basis - Prerogatives of the European Parliament. - Case C-295/90.

European Court reports 1992 Page I-04193
Swedish special edition Page I-00001
Finnish special edition Page I-00001


Summary
Parties
Grounds
Decision on costs
Operative part

Keywords

++++

1. EEC Treaty ° Article 235 ° Scope

2. Acts of the institutions ° Choice of legal basis ° Criteria

3. Community law ° Principles ° Equal treatment ° Discrimination on grounds of nationality ° Prohibited ° Access to vocational training ° Consequences ° Right of entry and residence of a national of another Member State admitted to a vocational training course ° Directive 90/366/EEC on the right of residence for students ° Legal basis ° Second paragraph of Article 7 of the EEC Treaty

(EEC Treaty, Art. 7, second para.; Council Directive 90/366)

4. Actions for annulment ° Judgment annulling a measure ° Effects ° Limitation by the Court ° Applied to a directive

(EEC Treaty, Art. 174(2))

Summary

1. It follows from the very wording of Article 235 of the Treaty that recourse to that provision as the legal basis for a measure is justified only where no other provision of the Treaty gives the Community institutions the necessary power to adopt the measure in question.

2. In the context of the organization of the powers of the Community, the choice of a legal basis for a measure must be based on objective factors which are amenable to judicial review. Those factors include, in particular, the aim and content of the measure.

3. The principle of non-discrimination with regard to conditions of access to vocational training deriving from Articles 7 and 128 of the EEC Treaty implies that a national of a Member State who has been admitted to a vocational training course in another Member State enjoys, in this respect, a right of residence for the duration of the course.

Designed to uphold and regulate the right of residence of students who are nationals of a Member State, Directive 90/366 lays down, in an area covered by the Treaty, namely that of vocational training referred to in Article 128 thereof, rules prohibiting discrimination on grounds of nationality, as envisaged in the second paragraph of Article 7 of the Treaty.

Having regard to the content of the directive and in view of the fact that measures adopted under the second paragraph of Article 7 of the Treaty do not necessarily have to be limited to rules governing the rights which derive from the first paragraph of that article but may also be concerned with matters in respect of which rules appear to be required in order to ensure that those rights can be effectively exercised, the Council was competent to adopt Directive 90/366 on the basis of the second paragraph of Article 7 of the Treaty. Consequently, it was not entitled to rely on Article 235 and the directive must therefore be annulled.

4. Outright annulment of Directive 90/366 on the right of residence for students would be likely to undermine the exercise of a right conferred by the Treaty, namely a student' s right of residence for vocational training purposes. Moreover, the essential legislative content of the directive, for which the period for implementation by the Member States has already expired, is not challenged either by the institutions or by the Member States. In those circumstances, important reasons of legal certainty, comparable to those which operate in cases where certain regulations are annulled, justify a decision by the Court, in the exercise of the power expressly conferred on it by Article 174(2) of the EEC Treaty in such cases, to maintain for the time being all the effects of the directive annulled, until such time as the Council has replaced it with a new directive adopted on the proper legal basis.

Parties

In Case C-295/90,

European...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
25 cases
  • Arnold André GmbH & Co. KG v Landrat des Kreises Herford.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 7 September 2004
    ...puede ser muy similar a la motivación proporcionada por el Tribunal de Justicia en su sentencia de 7 de julio de 1992, Parlamento/Consejo (C‑295/90, Rec. p. I‑4193). OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL GEELHOED delivered on 7 September 2004 (1) Case C-434/02 Arnold André GmbH & Co. KG v Landrat des......
  • Rudy Grzelczyk v Centre public d'aide sociale d'Ottignies-Louvain-la-Neuve.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 20 September 2001
    ...90/366/EEC of 28 June 1990 on the right of residence for students (OJ 1990 L 180, p. 30) after it was annulled by the Court of Justice (Case C-295/90 Parliament v Council [1992] ECR I-4193) - state that beneficiaries of those directives must not become an unreasonable burden on the public f......
  • Brian Francis Collins v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 10 July 2003
    ...1990 (JO L 180, p. 30), qui avait le même objet et qui avait été annulée par la Cour dans son arrêt du 7 juillet 1992, Parlement/Conseil (C‑295/90, Rec. p. I‑4193) au motif qu’elle reposait sur une juridique erronée. La Cour avait décidé de maintenir provisoirement en vigueur les effets de ......
  • European Parliament v Council of the European Union.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 12 July 2005
    ...10. 7 – Sentencias de 26 de marzo de 1987, Comisión/Consejo, citada en la nota 6, apartado 13; de 7 de julio de 1992, Parlamento/Consejo (C‑295/90, Rec. p. I‑4193), apartado 11; de 13 de julio de 1995, España/Consejo (C‑350/92, Rec. p. I‑1985), apartado 26, y de 10 de julio de 2003, Comisió......
  • Get Started for Free
3 provisions
  • Draft Commission interpretative communication on concessions under Community law on public contracts
    • European Union
    • Legislation
    • Invalid date
    ...1989, affaire C-3/88: Dataprocessing, attendu 8. (24) Arrêt du 26 février 1992, affaire C-357/89. (25) Arrêt du 7 juillet 1992, affaire C-295/90. (26) Arrêt du 22 juin 1993, affaire C-243/89: Storebælt, attendu (27) Arrêt du 25 avril 1996, affaire C-87/94: Bus Wallons. (28) Ainsi, par exemp......
  • Commission interpretative communication on concessions under Community law
    • European Union
    • Legislation
    • Invalid date
    ...affaires jointes 62 et 63/81, Seco et Desquenne. (41) Arrêt du 26 février 1992, affaire C-357/89. (42) Arrêt du 7 juillet 1992, affaire C-295/90. (43) Arrêt du 22 juin 1993, affaire C-243/89, Storebaelt, att. (44) Arrêt du 25 avril 1996, affaire C-87/94, Bus wallons. Voir également arrêt du......
  • Council Directive 93/96/EEC of 29 October 1993 on the right of residence for students
    • European Union
    • Legislation
    • Invalid date
    ...économique ou qu'ils sont membres de la famille d'un travailleur migrant; considérant que, par arrêt du 7 juillet 1992 rendu dans l'affaire C-295/90, la Cour de justice a annulé la directive 90/366/CEE du Conseil, du 28 juin 1990, relative au droit de séjour des étudiants (1), tout en maint......