Centrosteel Srl contra Adipol GmbH.
| Jurisdiction | European Union |
| Court | Court of Justice (European Union) |
| Writing for the Court | Jann |
| ECLI | ECLI:EU:C:2000:402 |
| Docket Number | C-456/98 |
| Date | 13 July 2000 |
| Procedure Type | Reference for a preliminary ruling |
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 13 July 2000. - Centrosteel Srl v Adipol GmbH. - Reference for a preliminary ruling: Pretore di Brescia - Italy. - Directive 86/653/EEC - Self-employed commercial agents - National legislation providing that commercial agency contracts concluded by persons not entered in the register of agents are void. - Case C-456/98.
European Court reports 2000 Page I-06007
Summary
Parties
Grounds
Decision on costs
Operative part
1. Freedom of movement for persons - Freedom of establishment - Independent commercial agents - Directive 86/653 - National rule which makes the validity of an agency contract conditional upon the commercial agent being entered in the appropriate register - Not permissible
(Council Directive 86/653)
2. Acts of the institutions - Directives - Implementation by the Member States - Need to ensure that directives are effective - Obligations of national courts
(EC Treaty, Art. 189, third para. (now Art. 249 EC, third para.))
Summary
1. Directive 86/653/EEC on the coordination of the laws of the Member States relating to self-employed commercial agents precludes national legislation which makes the validity of an agency contract conditional upon the commercial agent being entered in the appropriate register.
( see paras 14, 19 and operative part )
2. The national court is bound, when applying provisions of domestic law predating or postdating a directive, to interpret those provisions, so far as possible, in the light of the wording and purpose of the directive, so that those provisions are applied in a manner consistent with the result pursued by the directive.
( see paras 16, 19 and operative part )
PartiesIn Case C-456/98,
REFERENCE to the Court under Article 177 of the EC Treaty (now Article 234 EC) by the Pretore di Brescia, Italy, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that court between
Centrosteel Srl
and
Adipol GmbH,
on the interpretation of Council Directive 86/653/EEC of 18 December 1986 on the coordination of the laws of the Member States relating to self-employed commercial agents (OJ 1986 L 382, p. 17) and of the provisions in Chapter 2 and Chapter 3 of Title III of Part Three of the EC Treaty concerning, respectively, freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services,
THE COURT (First Chamber),
composed of: L. Sevón, President of the Chamber, P. Jann (Rapporteur) and M. Wathelet, Judges,
Advocate General: F.G. Jacobs,
Registrar: R. Grass,
after considering the written observations submitted on behalf of:
- Adipol GmbH, by B. Terrano, of the Trieste Bar, and G. Orlandi, of the Brescia Bar,
- the Italian Government, by U. Leanza, Head of the Legal Department in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, acting as Agent, assisted by P.G. Ferri, Avvocato dello Stato,
- the Commission of the European Communities, by M. Patakia and A. Aresu, both of its Legal Service, acting as Agents,
having regard to the report of the Judge-Rapporteur,
after hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General at the sitting on 16 March 2000,
gives the following
Judgment
Grounds1 By order of 24 November 1998, received at the Court on 15 December 1998, the Pretore di Brescia (Magistrates' Court, Brescia) referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling under Article 177 of the EC Treaty (now Article 234 EC) three questions on the interpretation of Council Directive 86/653/EEC of 18...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Mediaprint Zeitungs- und Zeitschriftenverlag GmbH & Co. KG v "Österreich"-Zeitungsverlag GmbH.
...du 27 juin 2000, Océano Grupo Editorial et Salvat Editores (C‑240/98 à C‑244/98, Rec. p. I‑4941, point 30); du 13 juillet 2000, Centrosteel (C‑456/98, Rec. p. I‑6007, point 16), et du 3 octobre 2000, Gozza e.a. (C‑371/97, Rec. p. I‑7881, point 37). En ce sens, également, arrêts du 13 novemb......
-
Bernhard Pfeiffer (C-397/01), Wilhelm Roith (C-398/01), Albert Süß (C-399/01), Michael Winter (C-400/01), Klaus Nestvogel (C-401/01), Roswitha Zeller (C-402/01) and Matthias Döbele (C-403/01) v Deutsches Rotes Kreuz, Kreisverband Waldshut eV.
...Editorial y Salvat Editores (asuntos acumulados C-240/98 a C-244/98, Rec. p. I-4941), apartado 30; y de 13 de julio de 2000, Centrosteel (C-456/98, Rec. p. I-6007), apartados 16 y 17 29 – Sentencia de 9 de marzo de 1978, Simmenthal (106/77, Rec. p. 629), apartado 25. Conclusions CONCLUSIONS......
-
Bernhard Pfeiffer (C-397/01), Wilhelm Roith (C-398/01), Albert Süß (C-399/01), Michael Winter (C-400/01), Klaus Nestvogel (C-401/01), Roswitha Zeller (C-402/01) and Matthias Döbele (C-403/01) v Deutsches Rotes Kreuz, Kreisverband Waldshut eV.
...– Judgments in Marleasing, paragraph 8 and Wagner Miret, paragraph 20; Case C‑91/92 Faccini Dori [1994] ECR I-3325, paragraph 26; and Case C-456/98 Centrosteel [2000] ECR I-6007, paragraph 15 – .Wagner Miret, paragraph 21. See Bernardeau, L.: ‘Clauses abusives: illicéité des clauses attribu......
-
Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta delivered on 9 June 2022.
...2013, Unamar (C‑184/12, EU:C:2013:663, Rn. 20); vgl. dazu auch Schlussanträge des Generalanwalts Jacobs in der Rechtssache Centrosteel (C‑456/98, EU:C:2000:137, Nrn. 21 bis 12 Vgl. dazu Beschluss vom 6. März 2003, Abbey Life Assurance (C‑449/01, nicht veröffentlicht, EU:C:2003:133, Rn. 13 b......