Stichting Rookpreventie Jeugd and Others v Staatssecretaris van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport.

JurisdictionEuropean Union
CourtCourt of Justice (European Union)
ECLIECLI:EU:C:2022:101
Date22 February 2022
Docket NumberC-160/20

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
22 cases
  • Public.Resource.Org, Inc. and Right to Know CLG v European Commission.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 5 March 2024
    ...el Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea (véase, en este sentido, la sentencia de 22 de febrero de 2022, Stichting Rookpreventie Jeugd y otros, C‑160/20, EU:C:2022:101, apartado 72 En segundo término, por lo que respecta al procedimiento de elaboración de las normas armonizadas, procede destac......
  • Umweltverband WWF Österreich and Others v Amt der Tiroler Landesregierung.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 11 July 2024
    ...disponeva alla data di adozione della normativa di cui trattasi (sentenza del 22 febbraio 2022, Stichting Rookpreventie Jeugd e a., C‑160/20, EU:C:2022:101, punto 67 e giurisprudenza ivi 36 Nella fattispecie, la direttiva Habitat è stata adottata il 21 maggio 1992 ed è stata modificata dall......
  • Leistritz AG v LH.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 22 June 2022
    ...contesto e degli obiettivi perseguiti dalla normativa di cui fa parte (sentenza del 22 febbraio 2022, Stichting Rookpreventie Jeugd e a., C‑160/20, EU:C:2022:101, punto 29 e giurisprudenza ivi 19 In primo luogo, per quanto riguarda il tenore letterale della disposizione di cui trattasi, si ......
  • Bayer Intellectual Property GmbH v kohlpharma GmbH.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 17 November 2022
    ...necessari per rispondere utilmente alle questioni che le vengono poste (sentenza del 22 febbraio 2022, Stichting Rookpreventie Jeugd e a., C‑160/20, EU:C:2022:101, punto 82 nonché la giurisprudenza ivi citata). 90 La funzione affidata alla Corte nell’ambito del procedimento pregiudiziale co......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles