Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Austria.

JurisdictionEuropean Union
Date16 December 2004
CourtCourt of Justice (European Union)
Arrêt de la Cour

Case C-358/03

Commission of the European Communities

v

Republic of Austria

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Workers’ protection – Health and safety of workers – Manual handling of loads where there is a risk of injury to workers)

Summary of the Judgment

Member States – Obligations – Implementation of directives – Failure to fulfil obligations – National system pleaded as justification – Not permissible

(Art. 226 EC)

A Member State may not plead situations in its internal legal order, including those resulting from its federal organisation, in order to justify failure to comply with the obligations and time-limits laid down in a directive. In that regard, a Federal State cannot argue that its constitutional law precludes it from adopting measures transposing a directive in the place of a federated State and that only censure by the Court confers the power on the Federal State to undertake the transposition.

Though each Member State may freely allocate areas of internal legal competence as it sees fit, the fact remains that it alone is responsible to the Community under Article 226 EC for compliance with obligations arising under Community law.

(see paras 12-13)




JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fourth Chamber)
16 December 2004(1)


(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Workers’ protection – Health and safety of workers – Manual handling of loads where there is a risk of injury to workers)

In Case C-358/03,ACTION for failure to fulfil obligations under Article 226 EC, brought on 19 August 2003, Commission of the European Communities, represented by D. Martin and H. Kreppel, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg,

applicant,

v

Republic of Austria, represented by E. Riedl, acting as Agent, with an address for service in Luxembourg,

defendant,



THE COURT (Fourth Chamber),,



composed of: K. Lenaerts, President of the Chamber, N. Colneric (Rapporteur) and J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, Judges, Advocate General: A. Tizzano,
Registrar: R. Grass, having regard to the written procedure,

having decided, after hearing the Advocate General, to proceed to judgment without an opinion,

gives the following



Judgment

1
By its application, the Commission of the European Communities asks the Court to make a declaration that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 practice notes
  • Conclusiones del Abogado General Sr. M. Bobek, presentadas el 6 de febrero de 2019.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 6 d3 Fevereiro d3 2019
    ...justifier le non‑respect des obligations en vertu du droit de l’Union. Voir, par exemple, arrêt du 16 décembre 2004, Commission/Autriche (C‑358/03, EU:C:2004:824, point 59 Voir, pour une analyse approfondie, les conclusions de l’avocat général Cruz Villalón dans l’affaire Prunus et Polonium......
  • European Commission v Hellenic Republic.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 14 d4 Janeiro d4 2016
    ...arrêts Commission/Espagne (C‑147/94, EU:C:1995:111, point 5); Commission/Allemagne (C‑298/95, EU:C:1996:501, point 18); Commission/Autriche (C‑358/03, EU:C:2004:824, point 13), et Commission/Italie (C‑119/04, EU:C:2006:489, point 25) pour ajouter que la République hellénique ne saurait invo......
  • Commission of the European Communities v Portuguese Republic.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 13 d4 Julho d4 2006
    ...notamment, arrêts du 10 avril 2003, Commission/France, C-114/02, Rec. p. I‑3783, point 11, et du 16 décembre 2004, Commission/Autriche, C-358/03, Rec. p. I-12055, point 13). 32 Enfin, le recours en manquement ayant un caractère objectif (voir, notamment, arrêt du 17 novembre 1993, Commissio......
  • Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Belgium.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 17 d4 Julho d4 2008
    ...l’inobservation des obligations et des délais prescrits par une directive (voir, notamment, arrêts du 16 décembre 2004, Commission/Autriche, C‑358/03, Rec. p. I‑12055, point 13, et du 13 décembre 2007, Commission/Belgique, C‑528/06, point 8). 12 Dans ces conditions, il convient de considére......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
  • Conclusiones del Abogado General Sr. M. Bobek, presentadas el 6 de febrero de 2019.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 6 d3 Fevereiro d3 2019
    ...le non‑respect des obligations en vertu du droit de l’Union. Voir, par exemple, arrêt du 16 décembre 2004, Commission/Autriche (C‑358/03, EU:C:2004:824, point 59 Voir, pour une analyse approfondie, les conclusions de l’avocat général Cruz Villalón dans l’affaire Prunus et Polonium (C‑384/09......
  • European Commission v Hellenic Republic.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 14 d4 Janeiro d4 2016
    ...arrêts Commission/Espagne (C‑147/94, EU:C:1995:111, point 5); Commission/Allemagne (C‑298/95, EU:C:1996:501, point 18); Commission/Autriche (C‑358/03, EU:C:2004:824, point 13), et Commission/Italie (C‑119/04, EU:C:2006:489, point 25) pour ajouter que la République hellénique ne saurait invo......
  • Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Belgium.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 17 d4 Julho d4 2008
    ...l’inobservation des obligations et des délais prescrits par une directive (voir, notamment, arrêts du 16 décembre 2004, Commission/Autriche, C‑358/03, Rec. p. I‑12055, point 13, et du 13 décembre 2007, Commission/Belgique, C‑528/06, point 8). 12 Dans ces conditions, il convient de considére......
  • Commission of the European Communities v Portuguese Republic.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 13 d4 Julho d4 2006
    ...notamment, arrêts du 10 avril 2003, Commission/France, C-114/02, Rec. p. I‑3783, point 11, et du 16 décembre 2004, Commission/Autriche, C-358/03, Rec. p. I-12055, point 13). 32 Enfin, le recours en manquement ayant un caractère objectif (voir, notamment, arrêt du 17 novembre 1993, Commissio......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT