European Commission v Italian Republic.
| Jurisdiction | European Union |
| Celex Number | 62009CJ0454 |
| ECLI | ECLI:EU:C:2011:650 |
| Court | Court of Justice (European Union) |
| Date | 13 October 2011 |
| Procedure Type | Recurso por incumplimiento – fundado |
| Docket Number | C-454/09 |
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 October 2011 – Commission v Italy
(Case C-454/09)
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – State aid – Aid for New Interline SpA – Recovery
1. Actions for failure to fulfil obligations – Failure to comply with a Commission decision concerning State aid – Duty to recover the aid granted – Period within which the aid is to be recovered (Arts 88(2) EC, 226 EC and 249 EC) (see paras 34, 37)
2. State aid – Recovery of unlawful aid – Recipient undertakings that become bankrupt – Aid entered in the schedule of liabilities in order to restore the status quo ante (Art. 88(2) EC) (see paras 35-36)
3. Actions for failure...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
7 cases
-
Opinion of Advocate General Rantos delivered on 27 March 2025.
...producers) (C‑11/20, EU:C:2021:380, paragraph 34 and the case-law cited). 24 See judgment of 13 October 2011, Commission v Italy (C‑454/09, EU:C:2011:650, paragraph 37 and the case-law 25 See judgments of 11 September 2014, Commission v Germany (C‑527/12, EU:C:2014:2193, paragraph 48 and th......
-
European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany.
...effect, judgment of 14 February 2008 in Case C‑419/06 Commission v Greece, paragraphs 38 and 61, and judgment of 13 October 2011 in Case C‑454/09 Commission v Italy, paragraph ( 21 ) Commission v Slovakia, paragraphs 47 to 52. ( 22 ) See Case C‑263/12 Commission v Greece [2013] ECR, paragra......
-
European Commission v French Republic.
...paragraph 104). See also judgments in Commission v Poland (C‑331/09, EU:C:2011:250, paragraphs 63 to 65) and Commission v Italy (C‑454/09, EU:C:2011:650, paragraphs 35 and ( 29 ) My emphasis. ( 30 ) See point 29 of this Opinion and newspaper article in Le Monde, 29 November 2014, p. 16, ent......
-
European Commission v Italian Republic.
...de cette décision. L’État membre doit, en principe, parvenir à un recouvrement effectif des sommes dues (arrêt Commission/Italie, C‑454/09, EU:C:2011:650, point 34 et jurisprudence citée). 50 La récupération doit s’effectuer sans délai et, au plus tard, dans celui prévu, le cas échéant, par......
Get Started for Free
1 provisions
-
Commission Decision (EU) 2017/2111 of 5 July 2016 on the setting-up and capitalisation of Airport Handling SpA SA.21420 (2014/C) (ex 2014/NN) implemented by Italy (notified under document C(2016) 4103) (Only the Italian text is authentic)Text with EEA relevance.
...situazione precedente alla concessione dell’aiuto. (21) Causa C-454/09, Commissione/Italia («Aiuto a favore della New Interline SpA»), ECLI:EU:C:2011:650, punto (22) C-610/10 Commissione/Regno di Spagna, ECLI:EU:C:2012:781, punto 106. (23) Cause riunite C-328/99 e C-399/00 Italia e SIM 2 Mu......