Commission of the European Communities v Council of the European Communities.
| Jurisdiction | European Union |
| Celex Number | 61987CJ0383 |
| ECLI | ECLI:EU:C:1988:388 |
| Court | Court of Justice (European Union) |
| Date | 12 July 1988 |
| Procedure Type | Recours en carence - non-lieu à statuer |
| Docket Number | 383/87 |
Judgment of the Court of 12 July 1988. - Commission of the European Communities v Council of the European Communities. - Budgetary procedure: compliance with the time-table laid down by the Treaty. - Case 383/87.
European Court reports 1988 Page 04051
Summary
Parties
Grounds
Decision on costs
Operative part
++++
Action for failure to act - Repair of failure to act after institution of proceedings - Subject-matter of action ceasing to exist - No need to give a decision
( EEC Treaty, Arts 175 and 176 )
SummaryThe remedy provided for in Article 175 of the Treaty is founded on the premiss that the unlawful inaction of the Council or of the Commission enables the other institutions and the Member States and, in certain circumstances, private persons to bring the matter before the Court in order to obtain a declaration that the failure to act is contrary to the Treaty, in so far as it has not been repaired by the institution concerned . The effect of that declaration under Article 176 is that the defendant institution is required to take the necessary measures to comply with the judgment of the Court, without prejudice to any actions to establish non-contractual liability to which the aforesaid declaration may give rise .
Where the act whose absence constitutes the subject-matter of the proceedings was adopted after the action was brought but before judgment a declaration by the Court to the effect that the initial failure to act is unlawful can no longer bring about the consequences prescribed by Article 176 . It follows that in such a case, as in cases where the defendant institution has responded within a period of two months after being called upon to act, the subject-matter of the action has ceased to exist, so that there is no longer any need to give a decision .
PartiesIn Case 383/87
Commission of the European Communities, represented by Bernard Paulin, Senior Legal Adviser, and John Forman, Legal Adviser, both members of its Legal Department, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the office of G . Kremlis, a member of the Legal Department of the Commission, Jean Monnet Building, Kirchberg,
applicant,
v
Council of the European Communities, represented by Arthur Alan Dashwood, Director of its Legal Department, and Félix van Craeyenest, Principal Administrator in its Legal Department, acting as Agents with an address for service in Luxembourg at the office of Jorn Kaeser, Manager of the Legal Directorate of the European Investment Bank, 100 boulevard Konrad...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Société de distribution mécanique et d'automobiles v Commission of the European Communities.
...that desired or considered necessary by the persons concerned (see Case 377/87 Parliament v Council [1988] ECR 4017, paragraphs 9 and 10; Case 383/87 Commission v Council [1988] ECR 4051, paragraphs 9 and 10, and Joined Cases C-15/91 and C-108/91 Buckl and Others v Commission [1992] ECR I-6......
-
Automec Srl v Commission of the European Communities.
...the applicant' s requests in their entirety . It considers that the Court of Justice applied the same principles in its judgment in Case 383/87 Commission v Council [1988] ECR 4051, especially at p . 4064 . 41 It must be pointed out that, under Article 92(2 ) of the Rules of Procedure of th......
-
Empresa Nacional de Urânio SA contra Comisión de las Comunidades Europeas.
...it has not been repaired by the institution concerned (judgments in Case 377/87 Parliament v Council [1988] ECR 4017, paragraph 9, and in Case 383/87 Commission v Council [1988] ECR 4051, paragraph 9). A reply given by the institutions to a request to act need not necessarily correspond wit......
-
¿Hacia un presupuesto específico de la unión económica y monetaria?
...del TJCE de 12 de julio de 1988, Parlamento/Consejo, C-377/87, ECLI:EU:C:1988:387 y la Sentencia de 12 de julio de 1988, Comisión/Consejo, C-383/87, ECLI:EU:C:1988:388. 2 DO L 347, de 20 de diciembre de 2013. ¿HACIA UN PRESUPUESTO ESPECÍFICO DE LA UNIÓN ECONÓMICA...? 235 En el momento prese......