Express Dairy Foods Limited v Intervention Board for Agricultural Produce.

JurisdictionEuropean Union
Celex Number61979CJ0130
ECLIECLI:EU:C:1980:155
Date12 June 1980
CourtCourt of Justice (European Union)
Procedure TypeReference for a preliminary ruling
Docket Number130/79

Arrêt de la Cour du 12 juin 1980. - Express Dairy Foods Limited contre Intervention Board for Agricultural Produce. - Demande de décision préjudicielle: High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division - Royaume-Uni. - Lactosérum - Répétition de l'indu. - Affaire 130/79.

Recueil de jurisprudence 1980 page 01887
édition spéciale grecque page 00271
édition spéciale suédoise page 00227
édition spéciale finnoise page 00235


Sommaire
Parties
Objet du litige
Motifs de l'arrêt
Décisions sur les dépenses
Dispositif

Mots clés

1 . AGRICULTURE - MONTANTS COMPENSATOIRES MONETAIRES - APPLICATION AU LACTOSERUM EN POUDRE - REGLEMENTS DE LA COMMISSION ADOPTES ENTRE LE 1ER FEVRIER 1973 ET LE 11 AOUT 1977 - INVALIDITE

2 . COMMUNAUTES EUROPEENNES - RESSOURCES PROPRES - MONTANTS COMPENSATOIRES PERCUS SUR LA BASE DE REGLEMENTS COMMUNAUTAIRES INVALIDES - RESTITUTION - APPLICATION DU DROIT NATIONAL - CONDITIONS ET LIMITES - PRISE EN CONSIDERATION DE LA REPERCUSSION EVENTUELLE DE LA CHARGE - ALLOCATION D' INTERETS

( DECISION DU CONSEIL DU 21 AVRIL 1970, ART . 6; REGLEMENT DU CONSEIL NO 2/71, ART . 1 )

Sommaire

1 . LES REGLEMENTS DE LA COMMISSION, ADOPTES ENTRE LE 1ER FEVRIER 1973 ET LE 11 AOUT 1977 ET FIXANT LES MONTANTS COMPENSATOIRES MONETAIRES AINSI QUE CERTAINS TAUX NECESSAIRES A LEUR APPLICATION, DOIVENT ETRE CONSIDERES COMME INVALIDES DANS LA MESURE OU ILS ETABLISSENT DES MONTANTS COMPENSATOIRES APPLICABLES AUX ECHANGES DE LACTOSERUM EN POUDRE ET SONT POUR AUTANT CONTRAIRES A L' ARTICLE 1ER, PARAGRAPHE 2, LETTRE B ) DU REGLEMENT NO 974/71 DU CONSEIL .

2 . LES LITIGES RELATIFS A LA RESTITUTION DE MONTANTS PERCUS POUR COMPTE DE LA COMMUNAUTE RELEVENT DE LA COMPETENCE DES JURIDICTIONS INTERNES ET DOIVENT ETRE TRANCHES PAR CELLES-CI EN APPLICATION DE LEUR DROIT NATIONAL, EN LA FORME ET AU FOND, DANS LA MESURE OU LE DROIT COMMUNAUTAIRE N' A PAS AUTREMENT DISPOSE EN LA MATIERE . TOUTEFOIS, L' APPLICATION DE LA LEGISLATION NATIONALE DOIT SE FAIRE DE FACON NON DISCRIMINATOIRE PAR RAPPORT AUX PROCEDURES VISANT A TRANCHER DES LITIGES DU MEME TYPE MAIS PUREMENT NATIONAUX ET LES MODALITES DE PROCEDURE NE PEUVENT ABOUTIR A RENDRE PRATIQUEMENT IMPOSSIBLE L' EXERCICE DES DROITS CONFERES PAR LE DROIT COMMUNAUTAIRE .

DANS CES CONDITIONS, IL APPARTIENT AUX AUTORITES NATIONALES, EN L' ABSENCE DE DISPOSITIONS COMMUNAUTAIRES, DE VEILLER A LA RESTITUTION DES SOMMES INDUMENT PERCUES SUR LA BASE DE REGLEMENTS COMMUNAUTAIRES DECLARES INVALIDES ET DE REGLER, EN FONCTION DU DROIT APPLICABLE, TOUTES QUESTIONS ACCESSOIRES TELLES QUE, D' UNE PART, LA PRISE EN CONSIDERATION DE LA REPERCUSSION EVENTUELLE, SUR D' AUTRES OPERATEURS ECONOMIQUES OU SUR LES CONSOMMATEURS, DE LA CHARGE INDUMENT IMPOSEE ET D' AUTRE PART, LE VERSEMENT D' INTERETS, EN PARTICULIER LE TAUX D' INTERET ET LA DATE A PARTIR DE LAQUELLE LES INTERETS DOIVENT ETRE CALCULES .

Parties

DANS L ' AFFAIRE 130/79 ,

AYANT POUR OBJET UNE DEMANDE ADRESSEE A LA COUR DE JUSTICE EN APPLICATION DE L ' ARTICLE 177 DU TRAITE CEE PAR LA HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE , QUEEN ' S BENCH DIVISION , COMMERCIAL COURT , ET TENDANT A OBTENIR DANS LE LITIGE PENDANT DEVANT CETTE JURIDICTION ENTRE

EXPRESS DAIRY FOODS LIMITED

ET

INTERVENTION BOARD FOR AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE

Objet du litige

UNE DECISION A TITRE PREJUDICIEL RELATIVE TOUT D ' ABORD A L ' EXTENSION EVENTUELLE DE LA JURISPRUDENCE MILAC ( AFFAIRE 131/77 , RECUEIL 1978 , P . 1041 ) A TOUS LES REGLEMENTS PRIS ENTRE LE 1 FEVRIER 1973 ET LE 11 AOUT 1977 , ETABLISSANT DES MONTANTS COMPENSATOIRES MONETAIRES APPLICABLES AUX ECHANGES DE LACTOSERUM EN POUDRE , ET ENSUITE , DANS L ' HYPOTHESE OU CETTE PREMIERE QUESTION AURAIT RECU UNE REPONSE POSITIVE ET OU TOUS CES REGLEMENTS SERAIENT DECLARES INVALIDES , AU DROIT A LA REPETITION DE L ' INDU ASSORTI DES INTERETS Y AFFERENTS ,

Motifs de l'arrêt

1 PAR ORDONNANCE DU 23 JUILLET 1979 , PARVENUE AU GREFFE DE LA COUR DE JUSTICE LE 10 AOUT 1979 , LA HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE , QUEEN ' S BENCH DIVISION , COMMERCIAL COURT , A , EN VERTU DE L ' ARTICLE 177 DU TRAITE CEE , POSE TROIS QUESTIONS RELATIVES RESPECTIVEMENT : A LA VALIDITE DE TOUS LES REGLEMENTS ARRETES PAR LA COMMISSION ENTRE LE 1...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
10 cases
  • Detlef Nölle contra Consejo de la Unión Europea y Comisión de las Comunidades Europeas.
    • European Union
    • General Court (European Union)
    • 18 September 1995
    ...provisions of Community law, the provisions of national law are applicable in the present case (judgment of the Court of Justice in Case 130/79 Express Dairy Foods v Intervention Board for Agricultural Produce [1980] ECR 1887). 24 Finally, according to the Commission, the public interest pr......
  • Roquette Frères SA v Hauptzollamt Geldern.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 27 October 1993
    ...and 10. (22) - R. Joliet, Le droit institutionnel des Communautés européennes - Le contentieux , p. 226. See, for example, the judgment in Case 130/79 Express Dairy Foods [1980] ECR 1887, Opinion of Mr Capotorti. The MCAs collected by the national authorities on the basis of Community regul......
  • The Queen contra Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, ex parte H. & R. Ecroyd Holdings Ltd y John Rupert Ecroyd.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 11 January 1996
    ...Case 145/79, cited above, footnote 26. (31) - Judgment in Case 23/75 Rey Soda [1975] ECR 1279. (32) - See, for example, the judgments in Case 130/79 Express Dairy Foods Ltd v Intervention Board for Agricultural Produce [1980] ECR 1887, paragraph 14 and in Case C-228/92 Roquette Frères [1994......
  • Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 8 May 1990
    ...and Bacon Commission v McCarren [1979] ECR 2161, Case 61/79 Amministrazione delle finanze dello Stato v Denkavit italiana [1980] ECR 1205, Case 130/79 Express Dairy Foods v Intervention Board for Agricultural Produce [1980] 1887 and Joined Cases 331, 376 and 378/85 Bianco & Girard v Directe......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT