Zuchtvieh-Export GmbH v Stadt Kempten.
| Jurisdiction | European Union |
| Celex Number | 62013CJ0424 |
| ECLI | ECLI:EU:C:2015:259 |
| Date | 23 April 2015 |
| Court | Court of Justice (European Union) |
| Procedure Type | Reference for a preliminary ruling |
| Docket Number | C-424/13 |
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber)
23 April 2015 ( *1 )
‛References for a preliminary ruling — Agriculture — Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 — Protection of animals during transport — Long journey between Member States and between Member States and third countries — Article 14(1) — Check to be carried out related to the journey log by the competent authority at the place of departure prior to long journeys — Applicability of that provision in regards to the stages of the journey taking place outside the territory of the European Union — Applicability of the standards fixed by that regulation to that part of the journey’
In Case C‑424/13,
REQUEST for a preliminary ruling under Article 267 TFEU from the Bayerischer Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Germany), made by decision of 2 July 2013, received at the Court on 25 July 2013, in the proceedings
Zuchtvieh-Export GmbH
v
Stadt Kempten,
intervening parties:
Landesanwaltschaft Bayern,
THE COURT (Fifth Chamber),
composed of T. von Danwitz, President of the Chamber, C. Vajda, A. Rosas, E. Juhász and D. Šváby (Rapporteur), Judges,
Advocate General: Y. Bot,
Registrar: I. Illéssy, Administrator,
having regard to the written procedure and further to the hearing on 10 July 2014,
after considering the observations submitted on behalf of:
|
— |
Zuchtvieh-Export GmbH, by C. Winterhoff and A. Wolowski, Rechtsanwälte, |
|
— |
the Stadt Kempten, by N. Briechle, acting as Agent, |
|
— |
the Landesanwaltschaft Bayern, by R. Käß, acting as Agent, |
|
— |
the Lithuanian Government, by D. Kriaučiūnas and Mme V. Čepaitė, acting as Agents, |
|
— |
the European Commission, by F. Erlbacher and H. Kranenborg and by B. Eggers, acting as Agents, |
after hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General at the sitting on 11 September 2014,
gives the following
Judgment
|
1 |
This request for a preliminary ruling concerns the interpretation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 of 22 December 2004 on the protection of animals during transport and related operations and amending Directives 64/432/EEC and 93/119/EC and Regulation (EC) No 1255/97 (OJ 2005, L 3, p. 1, and corrigendum OJ 2011, L 336, p. 86). |
|
2 |
The request has been made in proceedings between Zuchtvieh-Export GmbH (‘Zuchtvieh-Export’) the applicant in the main proceedings, and the Stadt Kempten (municipality of Kempten, Germany) regarding the decision taken by the Stadt Kempten, as the competent authority of the place of departure, to refuse clearance for a consignment of cattle to be transported by road from Kempten to Andijan (Uzbekistan). |
Legal context
|
3 |
Regulation No 1/2005 includes, inter alia, the following recitals:
...
...
...’ |
|
4 |
Article 1 of Regulation No 1/2005 defines the scope of the regulation: ‘1. This Regulation shall apply to the transport of live vertebrate animals carried out within the Community, including the specific checks to be carried out by officials on consignments entering or leaving the customs territory of the Community. 2. Only Articles 3 and 27 shall apply to:
...’ |
|
5 |
Article 2 of that regulation includes the following definitions: ‘...
...
...
...
...
...
...’ |
|
6 |
Under Article 3 of Regulation No 1/2005, entitled ‘General conditions for the transport of animals’: ‘No person shall transport animals or cause animals to be transported in a way likely to cause injury or undue suffering to them. In addition, the following conditions shall be complied with:
...
|
|
7 |
Article 5 of Regulation No 1/2005, entitled ‘Planning obligations for the transport of animals’, provides: ‘... (3) Organisers shall ensure that for each journey:
… (4) For long journeys between Member States and with third countries for domestic Equidae other than registered Equidae, and domestic animals of bovine, ovine, caprine and porcine species [‘animals concerned’], transporters and organisers shall comply with the provisions on the journey log set out in Annex II.’ |
|
8 |
According to Article 6(3) and (4) of the same regulation: ‘3. Transporters shall transport animals in accordance with the technical rules set out in Annex I. 4. Transporters shall entrust the handling of the animals to personnel who have received training on the relevant provisions of Annexes I and II.’ |
|
9 |
Article 8(2) of Regulation No 1/2005 provides: ‘Keepers shall check all animals arriving at a place of transit or a place of destination and determine if the animals are or have been subject to a long journey between Member States... |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Opinion of Advocate General Wahl delivered on 20 September 2018.
...an important issue, provided that it is not brought to their attention. 41 See, in particular, judgments of 23 April 2015, Zuchtvieh-Export (C-424/13, EU:C:2015:259, paragraph 35), and of 29 May 2018, Liga van Moskeeën en Islamitische Organisaties Provincie Antwerpen and Others (C-426/16, E......
-
Vion Livestock BV v Staatssecretaris van Economische Zaken.
...les arrangements effectués, de sorte que le voyage envisagé soit conforme audit règlement. 37. En substance, l’affaire Zuchtvieh-Export (C‑424/13) concernait ainsi le point de savoir si le règlement no 1/2005 pouvait s’appliquer, dans une situation de contrôle ex ante, à la partie du voyage......
-
Centraal Israëlitisch Consistorie van België e.a. and Others v LI and Others.
...27 ; du 10 septembre 2009, Commission/Belgique, C‑100/08, non publié, EU:C:2009:537, point 91, ainsi que du 23 avril 2015, Zuchtvieh-Export, C‑424/13, EU:C:2015:259, point 35), que de l’article 13 TFUE que la protection du bien-être des animaux constitue un objectif d’intérêt général reconn......
-
Liga van Moskeeën en Islamitische Organisaties Provincie Antwerpen, VZW and Others v Vlaams Gewest.
...Nationale Raad van Dierenkwekers en Liefhebbers and Andibel, C‑219/07, EU:C:2008:353, paragraph 27, and of 23 April 2015 Zuchtvieh-Export, C‑424/13, EU:C:2015:259, paragraph 65 It is in that context that the EU legislature took the view that, in order to avoid excessive and unnecessary suff......