Amoena Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs.
| Jurisdiction | European Union |
| Court | Court of Justice (European Union) |
| Writing for the Court | Lycourgos |
| ECLI | ECLI:EU:C:2019:1142 |
| Docket Number | C-677/18 |
| Date | 19 December 2019 |
| Procedure Type | Reference for a preliminary ruling |
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Tenth Chamber)
19 December 2019 ( *1 )
(Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common Customs Tariff — Tariff classification — Combined Nomenclature — Headings 6212 and 9021 — Mastectomy bras — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1167 — Validity — Notion of ‘accessories’ — Sincere cooperation)
In Case C‑677/18,
REQUEST for a preliminary ruling under Article 267 TFEU from the First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber), United Kingdom, made by decision of 1 November 2018, received at the Court on 5 November 2018, in the proceedings
Amoena Ltd
v
Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs,
THE COURT (Tenth Chamber),
composed of I. Jarukaitis, President of the Chamber, E. Juhász and C. Lycourgos (Rapporteur), Judges,
Advocate General: M. Bobek,
Registrar: A. Calot Escobar,
having regard to the written procedure,
after considering the observations submitted on behalf of:
|
– |
Amoena Ltd, by A. Mehlin, Solicitor, E. Brown, Barrister, G. Facenna QC, and A. Davies, Consultant, |
|
– |
the United Kingdom Government, by S. Brandon, acting as Agent, and by S. Singh, Barrister, |
|
– |
the European Commission, by A. Caeiros and J. Hradil, acting as Agents, |
having decided, after hearing the Advocate General, to proceed to judgment without an Opinion,
gives the following
Judgment
|
1 |
This request for a preliminary ruling concerns the validity of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1167 of 26 June 2017 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature (OJ 2017 L 170, p. 50). |
|
2 |
The request has been made in proceedings between Amoena Ltd and the Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (‘the tax authority’) concerning the tariff classification of mastectomy bras. |
Legal context
The CN
|
3 |
The customs classification of goods imported into the European Union is governed by the combined nomenclature (‘the CN’) set out in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ 1987 L 256, p. 1). The version of the CN applicable to the case in the main proceedings is that which results from that regulation, as amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1821 of 6 October 2016 (OJ 2016 L 294, p. 1). |
|
4 |
Part One of the CN contains preliminary provisions. In Section I of Part One, which contains general rules, subsection A, entitled ‘General rules for the interpretation of the Combined Nomenclature’, provides: ‘1. The titles of sections, chapters and sub-chapters are provided for ease of reference only; for legal purposes, classification shall be determined according to the terms of the headings and any relative section or chapter notes and, provided such headings or notes do not otherwise require, according to the following provisions. … 6. For legal purposes, the classification of goods in the subheadings of a heading shall be determined according to the terms of those subheadings and any related subheading notes and, mutatis mutandis, to the above rules, on the understanding that only subheadings at the same level are comparable. For the purposes of this rule, the relative section and chapter notes also apply, unless the context requires otherwise.’ |
|
5 |
Part Two of the CN, entitled ‘Schedule of customs duties’, is divided into 21 sections. Section XI, entitled ‘Textiles and textile articles’, includes in particular Chapter 62, entitled ‘Articles of apparel and clothing accessories, not knitted or crocheted’. |
|
6 |
Heading 6212 of the CN, to which a conventional rate of duty of 6.5% applies, is structured as follows:
|
|
7 |
Section XVIII of Part Two of the CN is entitled ‘Optical, photographic, cinematographic, measuring, checking, precision, medical or surgical instruments and apparatus; clocks and watches; musical instruments; parts and accessories thereof’. It includes in particular Chapter 90, entitled ‘Optical, photographic, cinematographic, measuring, checking, precision, medical or surgical instruments and apparatus; parts and accessories thereof’. |
|
8 |
Heading 9021 of the CN, the goods covered by which are exempt from conventional duty, is structured as follows:
|
|
9 |
Note 2(b) to Chapter 90 of the CN provides:
…’ |
|
10 |
Article 57 of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2013 laying down the Union Customs Code (OJ 2013 L 269, p. 1), entitled ‘Tariff classification of goods’, provides in paragraphs 1 and 4 thereof: ‘1. For the application of the Common Customs Tariff, tariff classification of goods shall consist in the determination of one of the subheadings or further subdivisions of the [CN] under which those goods are to be classified. … 4. The [European] Commission may adopt measures to determine the tariff classification of goods in accordance with paragraphs 1 and 2.’ |
|
11 |
Article 58 of that regulation, entitled ‘Conferral of implementing powers’, states in paragraph 2 thereof: ‘The Commission shall adopt, by means of implementing acts, the measures referred to in Article 57(4). …’ |
|
12 |
Article 285(1) of that regulation states: ‘The Commission shall be assisted by the Customs Code Committee. …’ |
Implementing Regulation 2017/1167
|
13 |
In order to ensure the uniform application of the CN, the Commission adopted Implementing Regulation 2017/1167, which, in accordance with Article 3, entered into force on 21 July 2017. |
|
14 |
Article 1 of that regulation provides: ‘The goods described in column (1) of the table set out in the Annex shall be classified within the [CN] under the CN code indicated in column (2) of that table.’ |
|
15 |
The Annex to that regulation reads as follows: ‘Annex
|
||||||||||||
Background to the dispute
|
16 |
Amoena, a company established in the United... |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
-
JCM Europe (UK) Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs.
...that effect, judgments of 12 February 2015, Raytek and Fluke Europe, C‑134/13, EU:C:2015:82, paragraph 29, and of 19 December 2019, Amoena, C‑677/18, EU:C:2019:1142, paragraph 37 and the case-law 35 In order to determine whether, in classifying the goods described in column 1 of the table s......
-
ZCC Europe GmbH v Hauptzollamt Düsseldorf.
...las sentencias de 12 de febrero de 2015, Raytek y Fluke Europe, C‑134/13, EU:C:2015:82, apartado 29; de 19 de diciembre de 2019, Amoena, C‑677/18, EU:C:2019:1142, apartado 37 y jurisprudencia citada, y de 4 de febrero de 2021, JCM Europe (UK), C‑760/19, EU:C:2021:96, apartado 30 Para determ......
-
Union des industries de la protection des plantes v Premier ministre and Others.
...Member States (judgments of 4 September 2014, Spain v Commission, C‑192/13 P, EU:C:2014:2156, paragraph 87, and of 19 December 2019, Amoena, C‑677/18, EU:C:2019:1142, paragraph 50 It is also important to note that the principle of sound administration is included among the guarantees confer......
-
BG Technik cs, a.s. v Generální ředitelství cel.
...betreffend die zolltarifliche Einreihung ein und derselben Ware bestehen kann (vgl. in diesem Sinne Urteil vom 19. Dezember 2019, Amoena, C‑677/18, EU:C:2019:1142, Rn. 56 Was fünftens das Argument betrifft, die Anwendung der Durchführungsverordnung 2021/1367 auf das SELVO-Fahrzeug verstoße ......