European Commission v Kingdom of the Netherlands.
| Jurisdiction | European Union |
| Celex Number | 62009CJ0079 |
| ECLI | ECLI:EU:C:2010:171 |
| Court | Court of Justice (European Union) |
| Docket Number | C-79/09 |
| Procedure Type | Recours en constatation de manquement - non fondé |
| Date | 25 March 2010 |
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 25 March 2010 – Commission v Netherlands
(Case C-79/09)
Failure of Member State to fulfil obligations – Value added tax – Directive 2006/112/EC – Articles 13 and 132 – Bodies governed by public law – Capacity as public authorities – Activities – Treatment as non-taxable persons – Exemptions – Socio-cultural, health and education sectors – ‘Euroregions’ – Promotion of work mobility – Making available of personnel – Burden of proof
1. Actions for failure to fulfil obligations – Pre-litigation procedure – Subject-matter (Art. 226 EC) (see paras 21-24)
2. Tax provisions – Harmonisation of laws – Turnover taxes – Common...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
8 cases
-
Gmina Wrocław v Minister Finansów.
...(C‑288/07, EU:C:2008:505), apartados 25 a 28 y 38; Comisión/Irlanda (C‑554/07, EU:C:2009:464), apartados 39 a 41, y Comisión/Países Bajos (C‑79/09, EU:C:2010:171), apartados 76 y ( 24 ) Conclusiones del Abogado General Léger presentadas en el asunto FCE Bank (C‑210/04, EU:C:2005:582), punto......
-
European Commission v Slovak Republic.
...C‑1/00, EU:C:2001:687, paragraph 53; Commission v Germany, C‑135/01, EU:C:2003:171, paragraph 19 and 20; and Commission v Netherlands, C‑79/09, EU:C:2010:171, paragraph 40 Thus, the pre-litigation procedure pursues the following three objectives: to allow the Member State to put an end to a......
-
Opinion of Advocate General Hogan delivered on 23 September 2021.
...da 33 a 35); del 1º dicembre 2005, Ygeia (C‑394/04 e C‑395/04, EU:C:2005:734, punti da 23 a 29); del 25 marzo 2010, Commissione/Paesi Bassi (C‑79/09, non pubblicata, EU:C:2010:171, punto 51); e del 10 giugno 2010, Future Health Technologies (C‑86/09, EU:C:2010:334, punto 27 V. sentenza del ......
-
Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 22 October 2020.
...(C‑699/15, EU:C:2017:344, point 25), du 10 juin 2010, CopyGene (C‑262/08, EU:C:2010:328, point 39), du 25 mars 2010, Commission/Pays‑Bas (C‑79/09, non publié, EU:C:2010:171, point 51) et du 1er décembre 2005, Ygeia (C‑394/04 et C‑395/04, EU:C:2005:734, point 18). 54 Arrêt du 14 juin 2007, H......
Get Started for Free