SC Cridar Cons SRL contra Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Cluj y Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Cluj-Napoca.

JurisdictionEuropean Union
Celex Number62020CJ0582
ECLIECLI:EU:C:2022:114
Docket NumberC-582/20
Date24 February 2022
CourtCourt of Justice (European Union)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
6 cases
  • Conclusiones del Abogado General Sr. P. Pikamäe, presentadas el 9 de junio de 2022.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 9 June 2022
    ...[arrêts du 16 octobre 2019, Glencore Agriculture Hungary (C‑189/18, EU:C:2019:861, point 38), et du 24 février 2022, SC Cridar Cons (C‑582/20, EU:C:2022:114, point 55 Voir point 2 de la décision de renvoi. 56 L’article 4, paragraphe 2, du protocole nº 7 à la CEDH prévoit la possibilité de r......
  • Conclusiones del Abogado General Sr. J. Richard de la Tour, presentadas el 8 de septiembre de 2022.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 8 September 2022
    ...19 Véase, a este respecto, en materia del impuesto sobre el valor añadido (IVA), la sentencia del 24 de febrero de 2022, SC Cridar Cons (C‑582/20, EU:C:2022:114), apartado 50 y jurisprudencia 20 Véase, a este respecto, en materia del IVA, la sentencia del 24 de febrero de 2022, SC Cridar Co......
  • Opinion of Advocate General Rantos delivered on 11 April 2024.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 11 April 2024
    ...lato sensu. 24 Voir point 27 des présentes conclusions. 25 Voir, en ce sens, en matière de TVA, arrêt du 24 février 2022, SC Cridar Cons (C‑582/20, EU:C:2022:114, point 26 Je mentionne que, selon la jurisprudence de la Cour, ce principe trouve à s’appliquer lorsqu’il s’agit de déterminer le......
  • Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 18 September 2025.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 18 September 2025
    ...2020, Minister van Buitenlandse Zaken (C‑225/19 and C‑226/19, EU:C:2020:951, paragraph 34), and of 24 February 2022, SC Cridar Cons (C‑582/20, EU:C:2022:114, paragraph 45 1998 Convention on access to information, public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental......
  • Get Started for Free