Union fédérale des consommateurs - Que choisir (UFC - Que choisir) and Consommation, logement et cadre de vie (CLCV) v Premier ministre and Ministre de l’Économie, des Finances et de la Relance.

JurisdictionEuropean Union
Celex Number62021CJ0407
ECLIECLI:EU:C:2023:449
Date08 June 2023
Docket NumberC-407/21
CourtCourt of Justice (European Union)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
11 cases
  • Opinion of Advocate General Medina delivered on 12 December 2024.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 12 December 2024
    ...(Mesures de reboisement) (C‑213/22, EU:C:2023:904, point 39). Voir, également, mes conclusions dans l’affaire UFC – Que choisir et CLCV (C‑407/21, EU:C:2022:690, point 26 [COM (2020) 613 final]. 27 Arrêt du 14 octobre 2010, Union syndicale Solidaires Isère (C‑428/09, EU:C:2010:612, point 40......
  • Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 25 April 2024.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 25 April 2024
    ...marzo 2023, Hauptpersonalrat der Lehrerinnen und Lehrer (C‑34/21, EU:C:2023:270), punto 41; e dell’8 giugno 2023, UFC — Que choisir e CLVC (C‑407/21, EU:C:2023:449), punto 21 L’espressione allevamento industriale è in uso nelle versioni francese («provenance d’élévage industriel interdite»)......
  • Opinion of Advocate General Emiliou delivered on 7 September 2023.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 7 September 2023
    ...et conclusions de l’avocat général Medina dans l’affaire UFC – Que choisir et CLCV (C‑407/21, EU:C:2022:690, points 1 et 181 Voir Conseil européen, conclusions du président du Conseil européen à la suite de la vidéoconférence sur le COVID-19 tenue avec les membres du Conseil européen, 17 ma......
  • Opinion of Advocate General Medina delivered on 7 March 2024.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 7 March 2024
    ...è messa in discussione dalle considerazioni che ho sviluppato al paragrafo 61 delle mie conclusioni nella causa UFC – Que choisir e CLCV (C‑407/21, EU:C:2022:690), citate dalla Commissione nelle sue osservazioni scritte. Infatti, tale paragrafo non mirava ad analizzare approfonditamente l’a......
  • Get Started for Free