WV v European External Action Service.

JurisdictionEuropean Union
Celex Number62020CJ0162
ECLIECLI:EU:C:2022:153
Date03 March 2022
Docket NumberC-162/20
CourtCourt of Justice (European Union)
Procedure TypeRecurso de funcionarios
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
7 cases
  • Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 30 November 2023.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • November 30, 2023
    ...par exemple, arrêts du 20 mai 2021, Dickmanns/EUIPO (C‑63/20 P, non publié, EU:C:2021:406, points 29 et suiv.), et du 3 mars 2022, WV/SEAE (C‑162/20 P, 31 Voir articles 28 et 29, du règlement 2019/942. 32 Voir, par exemple, article 79, paragraphe 1, point 1, de la Verwaltungsgerichtsordnung......
  • European Union Intellectual Property Office v The KaiKai Company Jaeger Wichmann GbR.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • February 27, 2024
    ...sentido, las sentencias de 29 de marzo de 2012, Comisión/Estonia, C‑505/09 P, EU:C:2012:179, apartado 34, y de 3 de marzo de 2022, WV/SEAE, C‑162/20 P, EU:C:2022:153 apartados 67 y 97 En el presente asunto, es preciso señalar que los elementos de Derecho en los que se basa el supuesto vicio......
  • Opinion of Advocate General Pikamäe delivered on 14 July 2022.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • July 14, 2022
    ...sind in den Erwägungsgründen 14 und 15 der Verordnung Nr. 1023/2013 aufgeführt. 10 Vgl. in diesem Sinne Urteil vom 3. März 2022, WV/EAD (C‑162/20 P, EU:C:2022:153, Rn. 92 und die dort angeführte 11 Dieser Begriff findet sich u. a. in der deutschen („sinngemäß“), der estnischen („analoogia“)......
  • Antonio Del Valle Ruíz y otros contra Junta Única de Resolución.
    • European Union
    • General Court (European Union)
    • November 22, 2023
    ...il fondamento del ricorso, poiché gli allegati hanno una funzione meramente probatoria e strumentale [v. sentenze del 3 marzo 2022, WV/SEAE, C‑162/20 P, EU:C:2022:153, punti 68 e 70 e giurisprudenza ivi citata, e del 1º giugno 2022, Algebris (UK) e Anchorage Capital Group/Commissione, T‑570......
  • Get Started for Free