James Wood v Fonds de garantie des victimes des actes de terrorisme et d’autres infractions.

JurisdictionEuropean Union
Celex Number62007CJ0164
ECLIECLI:EU:C:2008:321
Date05 June 2008
CourtCourt of Justice (European Union)
Procedure TypeReference for a preliminary ruling
Docket NumberC-164/07

Case C-164/07

James Wood

v

Fonds de garantie des victimes des actes de terrorisme et d’autres infractions

(Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Commission d'indemnisation des victimes d'infractions du tribunal de grande instance de Nantes)

(Article 12 EC – Discrimination on grounds of nationality – Compensation awarded by the Fonds de garantie des victimes des actes de terrorisme et d’autres infractions – Not included)

Summary of the Judgment

Community law – Principles – Equal treatment – Discrimination on grounds of nationality

(Art. 12 EC)

Community law precludes legislation of a Member State which excludes nationals of other Member States who live and work in its territory from the grant of compensation intended to make good losses resulting from offences against the person where the crime in question was not committed in the territory of that State, on the sole ground of their nationality.

(see para. 16, operative part)







JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Second Chamber)

5 June 2008 (*)

(Article 12 EC – Discrimination on grounds of nationality – Compensation awarded by the Fonds de garantie des victimes des actes de terrorisme et d’autres infractions – Not included)

In Case C‑164/07,

REFERENCE for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC, by the Commission d’indemnisation des victimes d’infractions du Tribunal de Grande Instance de Nantes (France), made by decision of 16 March 2007, received at the Court on 27 March 2007, in the proceedings

James Wood

v

Fonds de garantie des victimes des actes de terrorisme et d’autres infractions,

THE COURT (Second Chamber),

composed of C.W.A. Timmermans, President of the Chamber, K. Schiemann, J. Makarczyk (Rapporteur), J.-C. Bonichot and C. Toader, Judges,

Advocate General: J. Kokott,

Registrar: K. Sztranc-Sławiczek, Administrator,

having regard to the written procedure and further to the hearing on 31 January 2008,

after considering the observations submitted on behalf of:

– Mr Wood, by J.-E. Robiou du Pont, avocat,

– the Fonds de garantie des actes de terrorisme and d’autres infractions, by M. Bonnely, avocat,

– the French Government, by G. de Bergues, B. Messmer and O. Christmann, acting as Agents,

– the Italian Government, by I.M. Braguglia, acting as Agent, assisted by D. Del Gaizo, avvocato dello Stato,

– the Portuguese Government, by L. Fernandes and I. Azevedo, acting as Agents,

– the Commission of the European Communities, by D. Maidani, acting as Agent,

after hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General at the sitting on 28 February 2008,

gives the following

Judgment

1 The reference for a preliminary ruling concerns the interpretation of the first paragraph of Article 12 EC. The reference was made in the course of proceedings brought by Mr Wood, a British national, against the Fonds de garantie des victimes des actes de...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
7 cases
  • Conclusiones del Abogado General Sr. P. Pikamäe, presentadas el 29 de julio de 2019.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 29 July 2019
    ...del Consejo) comparten este análisis de la alegación del recurrente. 10 Véanse, en particular, las sentencias de 5 de junio de 2008, Wood (C‑164/07, EU:C:2008:321), apartado 13, y de 19 de noviembre de 2009, Sturgeon y otros (C‑402/07 y C‑432/07, EU:C:2009:716), apartado 11 En el apartado 3......
  • Heinz Huber v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 16 December 2008
    ...la nationalité des personnes concernées et proportionnées à l’objectif légitimement poursuivi (voir, en ce sens, arrêt du 5 juin 2008, Wood, C‑164/07, non encore publié au Recueil, point 13 et jurisprudence citée). 76 Il y a donc lieu de comparer, dans un contexte tel que celui de la cause ......
  • European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 14 September 2010
    ...apartados 26 y 29; de 16 de enero de 2003, Comisión/Italia (C‑388/01, Rec. p. I‑721), apartados 19 y 20; de 5 de junio de 2008, Wood (C‑164/07, Rec. p. I‑4143), apartado 13, y de 16 de diciembre de 2008, Huber (C‑524/06, Rec. p. I‑9705) apartados 78 y 79. 101 – Véanse las sentencias de 17 d......
  • Nicolas Bressol and Others and Céline Chaverot and Others v Gouvernement de la Communauté française.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 25 June 2009
    ...32 y 33. La Abogado General Kokott señaló acertadamente en las conclusiones presentadas en el asunto Wood (sentencia de 5 de junio de 2008, C‑164/07, Rec. p. I‑4143, punto 42 y nota 11), que aunque sea discutible que pueda estar justificada una normativa nacional que directamente discrimine......
  • Get Started for Free