Jeroen van Schijndel y Johannes Nicolaas Cornelis van Veen contra Stichting Pensioenfonds voor Fysiotherapeuten.

JurisdictionEuropean Union
Celex Number61993CJ0430
ECLIECLI:EU:C:1995:441
Date14 December 1995
CourtCourt of Justice (European Union)
Procedure TypeReference for a preliminary ruling
Docket NumberC-431/93,C-430/93
61993J0430

Judgment of the Court of 14 December 1995. - Jeroen van Schijndel and Johannes Nicolaas Cornelis van Veen v Stichting Pensioenfonds voor Fysiotherapeuten. - References for a preliminary ruling: Hoge Raad - Netherlands. - Treatment of an occupational pension fund as an undertaking - Compulsory membership of an occupational pension scheme - Compatibility with the rules of competition - Whether a point of Community law may be raised for the first time in cassation, thereby altering the subject-matter of the proceedings and entailing an examination of facts. - Joined cases C-430/93 and C-431/93.

European Court reports 1995 Page I-04705


Summary
Parties
Grounds
Decision on costs
Operative part

Keywords

++++

Community law ° Direct effect ° Individual rights ° Protection by national courts and tribunals ° Legal proceedings ° Detailed national procedural rules ° Conditions of application ° Assessment by national courts of their own motion of a plea alleging a breach of Community law ° Limits ° Principle that civil courts have only a passive role

(EEC Treaty, Arts 3(f), 5, 85, 86, 90 and 177)

Summary

In proceedings concerning civil rights and obligations freely entered into by the parties, it is for the national court or tribunal to apply binding Community provisions such as Articles 3(f), 85, 86 and 90 of the Treaty even when the party with an interest in application of those provisions has not relied on them, where domestic law allows such application by the national court or tribunal.

Pursuant to the principle of cooperation laid down in Article 5 of the Treaty, it is for national courts and tribunals to ensure the legal protection which individuals derive from the direct effect of provisions of Community law.

However, Community law does not require national courts to raise of their own motion an issue concerning the breach of provisions of Community law where examination of that issue would oblige them to abandon the passive role assigned to them by going beyond the ambit of the dispute defined by the parties themselves and relying on facts and circumstances other than those on which the party with an interest in application of those provisions bases his claim.

In the absence of Community rules governing the matter, it is for the domestic legal system of each Member State to designate the courts and tribunals having jurisdiction and to lay down the detailed procedural rules governing actions for safeguarding rights which individuals derive from the direct effect of Community law. However, such rules must not be less favourable than those governing similar domestic actions nor render virtually impossible or excessively difficult the exercise of rights conferred by Community law. A rule of national law preventing the procedure laid down in Article 177 of the Treaty from being followed must, in this regard, be set aside.

Each case which raises the question whether a national procedural provision renders application of Community law impossible or excessively difficult must be analysed by reference to the role of that provision in the procedure, its progress and its special features, viewed as a whole, before the various national instances. In the light of that analysis the basic principles of the domestic judicial system, such as protection of the rights of the defence, the principle of legal certainty and the proper conduct of procedure, must, where appropriate, be taken into consideration.

In that regard, the principle that in a civil suit it is for the parties to take the initiative, the court or tribunal being able to act of its own motion only in exceptional cases where the public interest requires its intervention, reflects conceptions prevailing in most of the Member States as to the relations between the State and the individual, safeguards the rights of the defence and ensures proper conduct of proceedings by, in particular, protecting them from the delays inherent in examination of new pleas.

Parties

In Joined Cases C-430/93 and C-431/93,

REFERENCES to the Court under Article 177 of the EEC Treaty by the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that court between

Jeroen van Schijndel

and

Stichting Pensioenfonds voor Fysiotherapeuten

and between

Johannes Nicolaas Cornelis van Veen

and

Stichting Pensioenfonds voor Fysiotherapeuten

on (i) the interpretation of Community law with regard to the power of a national court to consider of its own motion the compatibility of a rule of domestic law with Articles 3(f), 5, 85, 86 and/or 90 of the EEC Treaty and (ii) the interpretation of those provisions,

THE COURT,

composed of: G.C. Rodríguez Iglesias, President, C.N. Kakouris, D.A.O. Edward, J.-P. Puissochet and G. Hirsch (Presidents of Chambers), G.F. Mancini, F.A. Schockweiler, J.C. Moitinho de Almeida (Rapporteur), P.J.G. Kapteyn, C. Gulmann, J.L. Murray, P. Jann and H. Ragnemalm, Judges,

Advocate General: F.G. Jacobs,

Registrar: R. Grass, Registrar, and H.A. Ruehl, Principal Administrator,

after considering the written observations submitted on behalf of:

° the appellants in the main proceedings, by I.G.F. Cath, of the Hague Bar,

° the respondent in the main proceedings, by P.A. Wackie Eysten, of the Hague Bar, and E.H. Pijnacker Hordijk, of the Amsterdam Bar,

...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
90 cases
4 books & journal articles
  • Las técnicas de reglamentación
    • European Union
    • Cooperación Judicial Civil en la Unión Europea. El cobro de las deudas La acción comunitaria en la dimensión procesal de la cooperación judicial civil. El cobro de las deudas
    • 28 October 2007
    ...FJ 17. [267] Sentencia del TJCE Mund, loc. cit. FJ 22. [268] Sentencia del TJCE de 14 de diciembre de 1995 en los asuntos acumulados C-430/93 y 431/93, van Schijndel c. Stichting, FJ [269] A. BIONDI, "The European Court of Justice and certain National Procedural Limitations: Not Such a Toug......
  • Jurisprudencia
    • European Union
    • Régimen jurídico de las ayudas públicas al transporte áereo en la Unión Europea
    • 28 October 2011
    ...Comisión c/ Italia - Eni Lanerossi II, as. C-350/93, Rep. 1995, p. I-699. Sentencia del TJ de 14 de diciembre de 1995, Van Schijndel, as. C-430/93, Rep. 1995, p. Sentencia del TJ 5 de marzo de 1996, Brasserie du Pêcheur, as. C-46/93, Rep. 1996, p. I-1029. Sentencia del TJ de 11 de julio de ......
  • La aplicación del Derecho de la UE sobre ayudas estatales por los órganos jurisdiccionales nacionales
    • European Union
    • Régimen jurídico de las ayudas públicas al transporte áereo en la Unión Europea
    • 28 October 2011
    ...Van Schijndel to Eco Swiss and Beyond», ERPL, 2004, nº 12, pp. 590. [717] Sentencia del TJ de 14 de diciembre de 1995, Van Schijndel, as. C-430/93, Rep. 1995, p. I-4705, apartado [718] Sentencia del TJ de 5 de octubre de 2006, transalpine Ölleitung in Österreich Gmbh y otros c/ Finanzlandes......
  • Jurisprudencia
    • European Union
    • Cooperación Judicial Civil en la Unión Europea. El cobro de las deudas Decision
    • 28 October 2007
    ...1997 en el asunto C-269/95, Francesco Benincasa c. Dentalkit Srl. - Sentencia del TJCE de 14 de diciembre de 1995 en los asuntos acumulados C-430/93 y 431/93, van Schijndel c. - Sentencia del TJCE de 26 de septiembre de 1996 en el asunto C-323/95, Data delecta. - Sentencia del TJCE de 9 de ......