Finanzamt München III contra Gerhard Mohsche.
| Jurisdiction | European Union |
| Court | Court of Justice (European Union) |
| Writing for the Court | Murray |
| ECLI | ECLI:EU:C:1993:203 |
| Docket Number | C-193/91 |
| Date | 25 May 1993 |
| Procedure Type | Reference for a preliminary ruling |
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 May 1993. - Finanzamt München III v Gerhard Mohsche. - Reference for a preliminary ruling: Bundesfinanzhof - Germany. - VAT - Taxation of private use of a business car. - Case C-193/91.
European Court reports 1993 Page I-02615
Summary
Parties
Grounds
Decision on costs
Operative part
++++
Tax provisions ° Harmonization of laws ° Turnover taxes ° Common system of value added tax ° Taxable transactions ° Private use of business goods purchased subject to deduction of input tax ° Taxation of services not subject to deduction of input tax for the maintenance and use of the goods ° Not permissible ° Possibility for individuals to rely on the relevant provision
(Council Directive 77/388, Art. 6(2)(a))
SummaryArticle 6(2)(a) of the Sixth Directive (77/388) on the harmonization of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes must be interpreted as precluding taxation of the private use of goods forming part of the assets of a business upon whose acquisition the taxable person was able to deduct the value added tax in so far as such use includes services which the taxable person received without deduction of input tax from third parties for the maintenance or use of the goods.
In so far as it precludes such taxation, the abovementioned provision may be relied upon by a taxable person before the competent national courts.
PartiesIn Case C-193/91,
REFERENCE to the Court under Article 177 of the EEC Treaty by the Bundesfinanzhof for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that court between
Finanzamt Muenchen III
and
Gerhard Mohsche
on the interpretation of Article 6(2) of Directive 77/388/EEC, Sixth Council Directive of 17 May 1977 on the harmonization of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes ° Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1),
THE COURT (Sixth Chamber),
composed of: C.N. Kakouris, President of the Chamber, J.L. Murray, G.F. Mancini, F.A. Schockweiler and D.A.O. Edward, Judges,
Advocate General: F.G. Jacobs,
Registrar: Lynn Hewlett, Administrator,
after considering the written observations submitted on behalf of:
° the Government of the Federal Republic of Germany, by Ernst Roeder, Ministerialrat at the Federal Ministry of Economic Affairs, and Claus-Dieter Quassowski, Regierungsdirektor at the said Ministry, acting as Agents,
° the Commission of the European Communities, by Henri Étienne, Principal Legal Adviser, acting as Agent,
having regard to the Report for the Hearing,
after hearing the oral observations of the parties at the hearing on 8 October 1992,
after hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General at the sitting on 10 November 1992,
gives the following
Judgment
Grounds1 By order of 18 April 1991, received at the Court on 29 July 1991, the...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Conclusiones del Abogado General Sr. M. Szpunar, presentadas el 17 de septiembre de 2020.
...14 Sentencia de 16 de octubre de 1997, Fillibeck (C‑258/95, EU:C:1997:491), apartado 25. 15 Sentencia de 25 de mayo de 1993, Mohsche (C‑193/91, EU:C:1993:203), apartados 8 y 9. 16 Así puede ocurrir, por ejemplo, cuando haya comprado dicho bien a una persona que no sea el sujeto pasivo (véas......
-
Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 10 February 2022.
...(C‑246/16, EU:C:2017:887, paragraph 23). 18 See Stadie, H., Umsatzsteuerrecht, 2005, paragraph 1.18. 19 Judgments of 25 May 1993, Mohsche (C‑193/91, EU:C:1993:203, paragraph 9); of 8 March 2001, Bakcsi (C‑415/98, EU:C:2001:136, paragraph 46); of 17 May 2001, Fischer and Brandenstein (C‑322/......
-
Peter Paul, Cornelia Sonnen-Lütte and Christel Mörkens v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.
...Rec. p. 3969), apartado 7; de 22 de junio de 1989, Fratelli Costanzo (103/88, Rec. p. 1839), apartado 29; de 25 de mayo de 1993, Mohsche (C‑193/91, Rec. p. I‑2615), apartado 17, y de 26 de septiembre de 2000, IGI Rec. p. I‑7717), apartado 36. 21 – Sentencia de 11 de agosto de 1995, Wärmekra......
-
Vereniging Noordelijke Land- en Tuinbouw Organisatie v Staatssecretaris van Financiën.
...Gregg (C‑216/97, Rec. p. I‑4947), apartado 20. 21 – Apartado 30. 22 – Ibidem (apartado 31). 23 – Sentencias de 25 de mayo de 1993, Mohsche (C‑193/91, Rec. p. I‑2615), apartados 13 y 14, y Enkler, antes citada (apartado 34). 24 – Véanse las sentencias de 4 de octubre de 1995, Armbrecht (C‑29......
-
Summary of EC law on recovery unlawful aid
...v Commission [1995] ECR II-1675, para. 97 to 99. [12] Ibid, para. 101. [13] Ibid. para. 103. [14] Ibid. para. 82-84 and 107. [15] Case C-193/91, Commission v Greece [1991] ECR I-3131, para. 17. [16] See, for example, Case C-277/00, Germany v Commission [2004] ECR I-3925, para. 80. [17] Case......