SIA „Rodl & Partner” v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests.

JurisdictionEuropean Union
CourtCourt of Justice (European Union)
Writing for the CourtKumin
ECLIECLI:EU:C:2022:883
Docket NumberC-562/20
Date17 November 2022
Procedure TypeReference for a preliminary ruling

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
7 cases
  • AS „PrivatBank” y otros contra Finanšu un kapitāla tirgus komisija.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 2 March 2023
    ...le blanchiment de capitaux et le financement du terrorisme, dans les limites du droit de l’Union (arrêt du 17 novembre 2022, Rodl & Partner, C‑562/20, EU:C:2022:883, point 65 D’autre part, conformément à l’article 59, paragraphe 4, de cette directive, les États membres peuvent habiliter les......
  • Conclusiones del Abogado General Sr. M. Campos Sánchez-Bordona, presentadas el 10 de julio de 2025.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 10 July 2025
    ...55 Urteile vom 18. April 2024, Citadeles nekustamie īpašumi (C‑22/23, EU:C:2024:327, Rn. 32) und vom 17. November 2022, Rodl & Partner (C‑562/20, EU:C:2022:883, Rn. 56 Die Richtlinie 2015/849 gilt bis zum 10. Juli 2027; ab diesem Datum wird sie durch die Verordnung (EU) 2024/1624 des Europä......
  • SIA „Laimz” v Izložu un azartspēļu uzraudzības inspekcija.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 19 June 2025
    ...situation can be identified, unlike the situation at issue in the case which gave rise to the judgment of 17 November 2022, Rodl & Partner, C‑562/20, 32 In those circumstances, the Administratīvā rajona tiesa (District Administrative Court) decided to stay the proceedings and to refer the f......
  • M v Lietuvos bankas.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 19 June 2025
    ...de los requisitos contemplados en esta Directiva (véase, por analogía, la sentencia de 17 de noviembre de 2022, Rodl & Partner, C‑562/20, EU:C:2022:883, apartado 35 En tercer lugar, la interpretación literal y contextual que obra en los apartados 29 y 32 a 34 de la presente sentencia queda ......
  • Get Started for Free