Commission of the European Communities v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

JurisdictionEuropean Union
CourtCourt of Justice (European Union)
Writing for the CourtPescatore
ECLIECLI:EU:C:1981:93
Docket Number804/79
Date05 May 1981
Procedure TypeRecurso por incumplimiento – fundado
EUR-Lex - 61979J0804 - EN

Judgment of the Court of 5 May 1981. - Commission of the European Communities v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. - Sea fisheries - Conservation measures. - Case 804/79.

European Court reports 1981 Page 01045
Swedish special edition Page 00079
Finnish special edition Page 00081
Spanish special edition Page 00229


Summary
Parties
Subject of the case
Grounds
Decision on costs
Operative part

Keywords

1 . FISHERIES - CONSERVATION OF THE RESOURCES OF THE SEA - PERIOD LAID DOWN BY ARTICLE 102 OF THE ACT OF ACCESSION - EXPIRATION - SOLE POWER OF THE COMMUNITY - FAILURE TO EXERCISE - EFFECTS - RESTORATION OF POWER TO THE MEMBER STATES - NOT PERMISSIBLE

( ACT OF ACCESSION , ART . 102 )

2 . FISHERIES - CONSERVATION OF THE RESOURCES OF THE SEA - POWERS OF THE EEC - FAILURE TO EXERCISE - EFFECTS - CONSERVATION MEASURES AS THEY EXISTED AT THE END OF THE PERIOD PRESCRIBED IN ARTICLE 102 OF THE ACT OF ACCESSION - MAINTENANCE - AMENDMENT BY THE MEMBER STATES - CONDITIONS - AVAILABLE ELEMENTS OF LAW - STRUCTURAL PRINCIPLES OF THE COMMUNITY

3 . MEMBER STATES - OBLIGATIONS - INITIATIVE OF THE COMMISSION - DUTIES OF MEMBER STATES - DUTIES OF ACTION AND ABSTENTION

( EEC TREATY , ART . 5 )

4 . FISHERIES - FISH STOCKS COMING WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE MEMBER STATES - EQUALITY OF ACCESS FOR FISHERMEN OF THE COMMUNITY - IMPLEMENTATION - SOLE POWER OF THE COUNCIL - UNILATERAL ACTION BY MEMBER STATES - NOT PERMISSIBLE

( EEC TREATY , ART . 7 , AND THIRD SUBPARAGRAPH OF ART . 43 ( 2 ); ACT OF ACCESSION , ART . 102 )

5 . FISHERIES - CONSERVATION OF THE RESOURCES OF THE SEA - CONSERVATION MEASURES AS THEY EXISTED AT THE END OF THE PERIOD PRESCRIBED IN ARTICLE 102 OF THE ACT OF ACCESSION - AMENDMENT BY THE MEMBER STATES - OBLIGATION TO CONSULT THE COMMISSION AND ABIDE BY ITS VIEWS

( ACT OF ACCESSION , ART . 102 ; COUNCIL DECISION OF 25 JUNE 1979 )

6 . FISHERIES - CONSERVATION OF THE RESOURCES OF THE SEA - CONSERVATION MEASURES AS THEY EXISTED AT THE END OF THE PERIOD PRESCRIBED IN ARTICLE 102 OF THE ACT OF ACCESSION - AMENDMENT BY THE MEMBER STATES - OBLIGATION TO CONSULT THE COMMISSION - PROCEDURE

( EEC TREATY , ART . 155 ; RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF 3 NOVEMBER 1976 , ANNEX VI ; COUNCIL DECISION OF 25 JUNE 1979 )

Summary

1 . SINCE THE EXPIRATION ON 1 JANUARY 1979 OF THE TRANSITIONAL PERIOD LAID DOWN BY ARTICLE 102 OF THE ACT OF ACCESSION , POWER TO ADOPT , AS PART OF THE COMMON FISHERIES POLICY , MEASURES RELATING TO THE CONSERVATION OF THE RESOURCES OF THE SEA HAS BELONGED FULLY AND DEFINITIVELY TO THE COMMUNITY . MEMBER STATES ARE THEREFORE NO LONGER ENTITLED TO EXERCISE ANY POWER OF THEIR OWN IN THE MATTER OF CONSERVATION MEASURES IN THE WATERS UNDER THEIR JURISDICTION . THE ADOPTION OF SUCH MEASURES , WITH THE RESTRICTIONS WHICH THEY IMPLY AS REGARDS FISHING ACTIVITIES , IS A MATTER , AS FROM THAT DATE , OF COMMUNITY LAW .

THE TRANSFER TO THE COMMUNITY OF POWERS IN THIS MATTER BEING TOTAL AND DEFINITIVE , THE FACT THAT THE COUNCIL HAS NOT ADOPTED , WITHIN THE REQUIRED PERIOD , THE CONSERVATION MEASURES REFERRED TO BY ARTICLE 102 OF THE ACT OF ACCESSION COULD NOT IN ANY CASE RESTORE TO THE MEMBER STATES THE POWER AND FREEDOM TO ACT UNILATERALLY IN THIS FIELD .

2 . IN THE ABSENCE OF PROVISIONS ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FORMS AND PROCEDURES PRESCRIBED BY THE EEC TREATY THE CONSERVATION MEASURES AS THEY EXISTED AT THE END OF THE PERIOD REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 102 OF THE ACT OF ACCESSION ARE MAINTAINED IN THE STATE IN WHICH THEY WERE AT THE TIME OF THE EXPIRATION OF THE TRANSITIONAL PERIOD LAID DOWN BY THAT PROVISION . HOWEVER , IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO EXTEND THAT IDEA TO THE POINT OF MAKING IT ENTIRELY IMPOSSIBLE FOR THE MEMBER STATES TO AMEND THE EXISTING CONSERVATION MEASURES IN CASE OF NEED OWING TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE RELEVANT BIOLOGICAL AND TECHNOLOGICAL FACTS IN THIS SPHERE . SUCH AMENDMENTS , OF A LIMITED SCOPE , COULD NOT INVOLVE A NEW CONSERVATION POLICY ON THE PART OF A MEMBER STATE SINCE THE POWER TO LAY DOWN SUCH A POLICY BELONGS HENCEFORTH TO THE COMMUNITY INSTITUTIONS . HAVING REGARD TO THE SITUATION CREATED BY THE INACTION OF THE COUNCIL , THE CONDITIONS IN WHICH SUCH MEASURES MAY BE ADOPTED MUST BE DEFINED BY MEANS OF ALL THE AVAILABLE ELEMENTS OF LAW AND BY HAVING REGARD TO THE STRUCTURAL PRINCIPLES ON WHICH THE COMMUNITY IS FOUNDED . THESE PRINCIPLES REQUIRE THE COMMUNITY TO RETAIN IN ALL CIRCUMSTANCES ITS CAPACITY TO COMPLY WITH ITS RESPONSIBILITIES , SUBJECT TO THE OBSERVANCE OF THE ESSENTIAL BALANCES INTENDED BY THE TREATY .

3 . ARTICLE 5 OF THE EEC TREATY IMPOSES ON MEMBER STATES SPECIAL DUTIES OF ACTION AND ABSTENTION IN A SITUATION IN WHICH THE COMMISSION , IN ORDER TO MEET URGENT NEEDS OF CONSERVATION OF RESOURCES IN FISH , SUBMITTED TO THE COUNCIL PROPOSALS WHICH , ALTHOUGH THEY WERE NOT ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL , REPRESENT THE POINT OF DEPARTURE FOR CONCERTED COMMUNITY ACTION .

4 . IN PURSUANCE OF ARTICLE 7 OF THE EEC TREATY COMMUNITY FISHERMEN MUST HAVE , SUBJECT TO EXCEPTIONS DULY PRESCRIBED , EQUAL ACCESS TO THE FISH STOCKS COMING WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE MEMBER STATES . THE COUNCIL ALONE HAS THE POWER TO DETERMINE THE DETAILED CONDITIONS OF SUCH ACCESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROCEDURES LAID DOWN BY THE THIRD SUBPARAGRAPH OF ARTICLE 43 ( 2 ) OF THE TREATY AND ARTICLE 102 OF THE ACT OF ACCESSION . THIS LEGAL SITUATION CANNOT BE MODIFIED BY MEASURES ADOPTED UNILATERALLY BY THE MEMBER STATES .

5 . IN A SITUATION CHARACTERIZED BY THE INACTION OF THE COUNCIL AND BY THE MAINTENANCE , IN PRINCIPLE , OF THE CONSERVATION MEASURES IN FORCE AT THE EXPIRATION OF THE PERIOD LAID DOWN IN ARTICLE 102 OF THE ACT OF ACCESSION , THE COUNCIL DECISION OF 25 JUNE 1979 AND THE PARALLEL DECISIONS , AS WELL AS THE REQUIREMENTS INHERENT IN THE SAFEGUARD BY THE COMMUNITY OF THE COMMON INTEREST AND THE INTEGRITY OF ITS OWN POWERS , IMPOSE UPON MEMBER STATES NOT ONLY AN OBLIGATION TO UNDERTAKE DETAILED CONSULTATIONS WITH THE COMMISSION AND TO SEEK ITS APPROVAL IN GOOD FAITH BUT ALSO A DUTY NOT TO LAY DOWN NATIONAL CONSERVATION MEASURES IN SPITE OF OBJECTIONS , RESERVATIONS OR CONDITIONS WHICH MIGHT BE FORMULATED BY THE COMMISSION .

6 . IN ORDER TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE DECISIONS OF THE COUNCIL AND OF THE PROCEDURE FIXED BY THE HAGUE RESOLUTION THE CONSULTATION TO BE ENGAGED IN BY THE GOVERNMENT OF A MEMBER STATE MUST , PRIOR TO THE ADOPTION OF CONSERVATION MEASURES , ALLOW THE COMMISSION TO WEIGH UP ALL THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE PROVISIONS PROPOSED AND TO EXERCISE PROPERLY THE DUTY OF SUPERVISION DEVOLVING UPON IT IN PURSUANCE OF ARTICLE 155 OF THE EEC TREATY .

Parties

IN CASE 804/79

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES , REPRESENTED BY ITS LEGAL ADVISERS , DONALD W . ALLEN AND JOHN TEMPLE LANG , ACTING AS AGENTS , WITH AN ADDRESS FOR SERVICE IN LUXEMBOURG AT THE OFFICE OF ITS LEGAL ADVISER , MARIO CERVINO , JEAN MONNET BUILDING , KIRCHBERG ,

APPLICANT ,

SUPPORTED BY

FRENCH REPUBLIC , REPRESENTED BY GILBERT GUILLAUME , DIRECTOR OF LEGAL AFFAIRS AT THE MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS , ACTING AS AGENT , AND FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE WRITTEN PROCEDURE BY PHILIPPE MOREAU-DEFARGES , ADVISER AT THE DIRECTORATE FOR LEGAL AFFAIRS AT THE MINISTRY FOR FOREIGN AFFAIRS , ACTING AS JOINT AGENT , WITH AN ADDRESS FOR SERVICE IN LUXEMBOURG AT THE EMBASSY OF THE FRENCH REPUBLIC ,

AND

IRELAND , REPRESENTED BY LOUIS J . DOCKERY , CHIEF STATE SOLICITOR , ACTING AS AGENT , ASSISTED , FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE ORAL PROCEDURE , BY JAMES LYNCH , ASSISTANT CHIEF STATE SOLICITOR , AND BY DECLAN N . C . BUDD , BARRISTER , WITH AN ADDRESS FOR SERVICE IN LUXEMBOURG AT THE IRISH EMBASSY ,

INTERVENERS ,

V

UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND , REPRESENTED BY R . D . MUNROW , ASSISTANT TREASURY SOLICITOR , ACTING AS AGENT , ASSISTED BY LORD MACKAY OF CLASHFERN , QC , AND PETER G . LANGDON-DAVIES , BARRISTER OF THE INNER TEMPLE , WITH AN ADDRESS FOR SERVICE IN LUXEMBOURG AT THE EMBASSY OF THE UNITED KINGDOM ,

DEFENDANT ,

Subject of the case

APPLICATION FOR A DECLARATION THAT , BY ADOPTING AND APPLYING IN 1979 CERTAIN NATIONAL MEASURES...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
30 cases
  • Opinion of Advocate General Medina delivered on 27 February 2025.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 27 Febrero 2025
    ...130 Ibidem, punto 73 e giurisprudenza ivi citata. 131 Ibidem, punto 75, e sentenza del 5 maggio 1981, Commissione/Regno Unito (804/79, EU:C:1981:93, punto 28). 132 V., in tal senso, sentenza del 20 aprile 2010, Commissione/Svezia (C‑246/07, EU:C:2010:203, punti 74 e 75). 133 Ibidem. 134 Sen......
  • Johannes Dietrich v Hessischer Rundfunk.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 26 Enero 2021
    ...or not the European Union has exercised its competence (see, to that effect, judgment of 5 May 1981, Commission v United Kingdom, 804/79, EU:C:1981:93, paragraph 55 However, it cannot be considered necessary for the use of the euro as the single currency within the meaning of Article 133 TF......
  • H & R Ecroyd Holdings Ltd contra Comisión de las Comunidades Europeas.
    • European Union
    • General Court (European Union)
    • 20 Mayo 1999
    ...ruling, its obligation so to act clearly also falls within its general obligation of supervision imposed by Article 155 of the Treaty (Case 804/79 Commission v United Kingdom [1981] ECR 1045, paragraph 30). 51 In the light of those initial findings, it is necessary to examine whether the Co......
  • Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 19 May 2022.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 19 Mayo 2022
    ...40 Urteil vom 17. Oktober 1995 (C-70/94, EU:C:1995:328). 41 Vgl. Urteil vom 5. Mai 1981, Kommission/Vereinigtes Königreich (804/79, EU:C:1981:93, Rn. 30). Vgl. insoweit auch Cremona, M., „Member States as Trustees of the Union Interests: Participating in International Agreements on Behalf o......
  • Get Started for Free
1 provisions
  • Declaration of the Commission of 27 July 1981
    • European Union
    • Legislation
    • Invalid date
    ...THE COMMISSION RECALLS , AS HAS BEEN CONFIRMED BY THE JURISPRUDENCE OF THE EUROPEAN COURT IN PARTICULAR IN THE JUDGMENT OF 5 MAY 1981 IN CASE 804/79 , THAT THE COMMISSION HAS CERTAIN RIGHTS AND DUTIES UNDER ARTICLE 155 OF THE TREATY . IN VIEW OF THE OVERRIDING PUBLIC INTEREST AND AS A PRECA......