French Republic v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
| Jurisdiction | European Union |
| Celex Number | 61978CJ0141 |
| ECLI | ECLI:EU:C:1979:225 |
| Court | Court of Justice (European Union) |
| Docket Number | 141/78 |
| Procedure Type | Recurso por incumplimiento – fundado |
| Date | 04 October 1979 |
Judgment of the Court of 4 October 1979. - French Republic v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. - Sea fisheries. - Case 141/78.
European Court reports 1979 Page 02923
Greek special edition Page 00431
Swedish special edition Page 00557
Finnish special edition Page 00611
Spanish special edition Page 01445
Summary
Parties
Subject of the case
Grounds
Decision on costs
Operative part
1 . FISHING - CONSERVATION OF THE RESOURCES OF THE SEA - POWERS OF THE EEC - LEGAL BASIS - SCOPE
( EEC TREATY , ARTS . 3 ( D ) AND 38 ; ACT OF ACCESSION , ART . 102 )
2 . FISHING - CONSERVATION OF THE RESOURCES OF THE SEA - TEMPORARY POWERS OF MEMBER STATES - CONDITIONS FOR EXERCISE - DUTY OF CO-OPERATION
( EEC TREATY , ART . 5 ; COUNCIL REGULATION NO 101/76 , ARTS . 2 AND 3 ; COUNCIL RESOLUTION OF 3 NOVEMBER 1976 , ANNEX VI )
3 . FISHING - CONSERVATION OF THE RESOURCES OF THE SEA - TEMPORARY POWERS OF MEMBER STATES - CONDITIONS FOR EXERCISE - DUTY OF CONSULTATION - APPLICATION TO NATIONAL IMPLEMENTING MEASURES OF AN INTERNATIONAL OBLIGATION
( COUNCIL RESOLUTION OF 3 NOVEMBER 1976 , ANNEX VI )
Summary
1 . THE POWERS OF THE COMMUNITY IN FISHING MATTERS ARE BASED ON ARTICLE 3 ( D ) OF THE TREATY IN CONJUNCTION WITH ARTICLE 38 ET SEQ . RELATING TO AGRICULTURE , INCLUDING ANNEX II TO THE TREATY , WHICH INCLUDES FISHERIES WITHIN THE SPHERE OF THE COMMON AGRICULTURAL POLICY . THE COMMUNITY ' S POWERS WERE CONFIRMED BY ARTICLE 102 OF THE ACT CONCERNING THE CONDITIONS OF ACCESSION AND THE ADJUSTMENTS TO THE TREATIES .
THOSE POWERS COVER ALL QUESTIONS RELATING TO THE PROTECTION OF THE FISHING GROUNDS AND THE CONSERVATION OF THE BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES OF THE SEA BOTH IN THE COMMUNITY ' S INTERNAL RELATIONS AND IN ITS RELATIONS WITH NON-MEMBER STATES . CONSEQUENTLY THE MEASURES ADOPTED IN THIS MATTER BY THE MEMBER STATES ARE SUBJECT TO ALL THE RELEVANT PROVISIONS OF COMMUNITY LAW .
2 . IN ADOPTING MEASURES IN THE SPHERE OF CONSERVATION OF FISHERY RESOURCES THE MEMBER STATES MUST OBSERVE ON THE ONE HAND ARTICLES 2 AND 3 OF COUNCIL REGULATION NO 101/76 LAYING DOWN A COMMON STRUCTURAL POLICY FOR THE FISHING INDUSTRY , UNDER WHICH ALL LAWS AND ADMINISTRATIVE RULES AND REGULATIONS DETERMINING THE RULES APPLIED BY EACH MEMBER STATE IN RESPECT OF FISHING IN THE MARITIME WATERS COMING UNDER ITS SOVEREIGNTY OR WITHIN ITS JURISDICTION MUST BE NOTIFIED TO THE OTHER MEMBER STATES AND THE COMMISSION , TOGETHER WITH ANY ALTERATIONS WHICH IT IS INTENDED TO MAKE IN THE FISHERY RULES SO LAID DOWN , AND ON THE OTHER HAND , ANNEX VI TO THE RESOLUTION ON FISHING ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL AT THE HAGUE ON 30 OCTOBER 1976 AND FORMALLY APPROVED ON 3 NOVEMBER 1976 . THAT RESOLUTION , IN THE PARTICULAR FIELD TO WHICH IT APPLIES , MAKES SPECIFIC THE DUTIES OF CO-OPERATION WHICH THE MEMBER STATES ASSUMED UNDER ARTICLE 5 OF THE EEC TREATY WHEN THEY ACCEDED TO THE COMMUNITY . PERFORMANCE OF THESE DUTIES IS PARTICULARLY NECESSARY IN A SITUATION IN WHICH IT HAS APPEARED IMPOSSIBLE , BY REASON OF DIVERGENCES OF INTEREST WHICH IT HAS NOT YET BEEN POSSIBLE TO RESOLVE , TO ESTABLISH A COMMON POLICY AND IN A FIELD SUCH AS THAT OF THE CONSERVATION OF THE BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES OF THE SEA IN WHICH WORTHWHILE RESULTS CAN ONLY BE ATTAINED THANKS TO THE CO-OPERATION OF ALL THE MEMBER STATES .
THUS THE INSTITUTION OF MEASURES OF CONSERVATION BY A MEMBER STATE MUST FIRST BE NOTIFIED TO THE OTHER MEMBER STATES AND TO THE COMMISSION ; A MEMBER STATE PROPOSING TO BRING SUCH MEASURES INTO FORCE IS REQUIRED TO SEEK THE APPROVAL OF THE COMMISSION , WHICH MUST BE CONSULTED AT ALL STAGES OF THE PROCEDURE .
3 . ANNEX VI TO THE HAGUE RESOLUTION IN THE WORDS OF WHICH ' ' THE MEMBER STATES WILL NOT TAKE ANY UNILATERAL MEASURES IN RESPECT OF THE CONSERVATION OF RESOURCES ' ' , EXCEPT IN CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES AND WITH DUE OBSERVANCE OF CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS , MUST BE UNDERSTOOD AS REFERRING TO ANY MEASURES OF CONSERVATION EMANATING FROM THE MEMBER STATES AND NOT FROM THE COMMUNITY AUTHORITIES . THE DUTY OF CONSULTATION ARISING UNDER THAT RESOLUTION THUS COVERS ALSO MEASURES ADOPTED BY A MEMBER STATE TO COMPLY WITH ONE OF ITS INTERNATIONAL OBLIGATIONS IN THIS MATTER .
Parties
IN CASE 141/78
FRENCH REPUBLIC , REPRESENTED BY GUY LADREIT DE LACHARRIERE...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 7 September 2023.
...del principio de cooperación leal. 4 Véanse, en particular, las sentencias de 4 de octubre de 1979, Francia/Reino Unido (141/78, EU:C:1979:225); de 16 de mayo de 2000, Bélgica/España (C‑388/95, EU:C:2000:244); de 12 de septiembre de 2006, España/Reino Unido (C‑145/04, EU:C:2006:543); de 16 ......
-
Conclusiones del Abogado General Sr. P. Pikamäe, presentadas el 11 de diciembre de 2019.
...ce qui concerne les recours sur le fondement de ces dispositions, voir, notamment, arrêts du 4 octobre 1979, France/Royaume-Uni (141/78, EU:C:1979:225) ; du 16 mai 2000, Belgique/Espagne (C‑388/95, EU:C:2000:244) ; du 12 septembre 2006, Espagne/Royaume-Uni (C‑145/04, EU:C:2006:543) ; du 16 ......
-
Northern Ireland Fish Producers' Organisation Ltd (NIFPO) y Northern Ireland Fishermen's Federation contra Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland.
...specific the duties of cooperation which the Member States assumed under Article 5 of the Treaty when they acceded to the Community (see Case 141/78 France v United Kingdom [1979] ECR 2923, paragraph 8). Annex VI relates to the introduction of conservation measures by the Member States and ......
-
Regina v Robert Tymen.
...ARTICLES 170 AND 169 OF THE EEC TREATY RESPECTIVELY . IN THE FIRST OF THESE CASES THE COURT DECLARED , IN ITS JUDGMENT OF 4 OCTOBER 1979 ( CASE 141/78 , FRANCE V UNITED KINGDOM , ( 1979 ) ECR 2923 ) THAT , BY BRINGING INTO FORCE ON 1 APRIL 1977 THE FISHING NETS ( NORTH-EAST ATLANTIC ) ORDER......
-
The Right of Defence and the exchange of tax information ruled by EU law
...T. TASSANI (Directors) I principi europei del diritto tributario . Padova. 2014. ECJ Judgments, 4 October 1979, France v. United Kingdom , C-141/78; 22 March 1983, Commission v France , C-42/82, paragraph 36; 27 September 1988, Matteucci , C-235/87, paragraph 19; 11 June 1991, Athnasopoulos......
-
El Derecho de defensa y el intercambio de información tributaria en el Derecho de la UE
...y T. TASSANI (Directors) I principi europei del diritto tributario. Padova. 2014. SSTJUE de 4 de octubre de 1979, France v. United Kingdom, C-141/78; de 22 de marzo de 1983, Commission v France, C-42/82, p. 36; de 27 de septiembre de 1988, Matteucci, C-235/87, p. 19; de 11 de junio de 1991,......