Ordre des avocats au Barreau de Paris v Onno Klopp.

JurisdictionEuropean Union
Celex Number61983CJ0107
ECLIECLI:EU:C:1984:270
Date12 July 1984
CourtCourt of Justice (European Union)
Procedure TypeReference for a preliminary ruling
Docket Number107/83
EUR-Lex - 61983J0107 - EN

Judgment of the Court of 12 July 1984. - Ordre des avocats au Barreau de Paris v Onno Klopp. - Reference for a preliminary ruling: Cour de cassation - France. - Freedom of establishment - Access to the legal profession. - Case 107/83.

European Court reports 1984 Page 02971
Spanish special edition Page 00687
Swedish special edition Page 00653
Finnish special edition Page 00635


Summary
Parties
Subject of the case
Grounds
Decision on costs
Operative part

Keywords

1 . FREE MOVEMENT OF PERSONS - FREEDOM OF ESTABLISHMENT - ARTICLE 52 OF THE TREATY - DIRECT EFFECT - FAILURE TO ADOPT DIRECTIVES - NO EFFECT

( EEC TREATY , ARTS 52 , 54 AND 57 )

2 . FREE MOVEMENT OF PERSONS - FREEDOM OF ESTABLISHMENT - SEVERAL PLACES OF WORK WITHIN THE COMMUNITY - LIBERAL PROFESSIONS

( EEC TREATY , ART . 52 )

3 . FREE MOVEMENT OF PERSONS - FREEDOM OF ESTABLISHMENT - ADVOCATES - ACCESS TO THE PROFESSION - ENROLMENT REFUSED BECAUSE OF MAINTENANCE OF CHAMBERS IN ANOTHER MEMBER STATE - INCOMPATIBILIY WITH THE TREATY

( EEC TREATY , ART . 52 ET SEQ .)

Summary

1 . IN LAYING DOWN THAT FREEDOM OF ESTABLISHMENT SHALL BE ATTAINED AT THE END OF THE TRANSITIONAL PERIOD , ARTICLE 52 IMPOSES AN OBLIGATION TO ATTAIN A PRECISE RESULT THE FULFILMENT OF WHICH MUST BE MADE EASIER BY , BUT NOT MADE DEPENDENT ON , THE IMPLEMENTATION OF A PROGRAMME OF PROGRESSIVE MEASURES . CONSEQUENTLY THE FACT THAT THE COUNCIL HAS FAILED TO ISSUE THE DIRECTIVES PROVIDED FOR BY ARTICLES 54 AND 57 CANNOT SERVE TO JUSTIFY FAILURE TO MEET THE OBLIGATION .

2 . THE RULE IN ARTICLE 52 OF THE TREATY , ACCORDING TO WHICH THE PROGRESSIVE ABOLITION OF THE RESTRICTIONS ON FREEDOM OF ESTABLISHMENT APPLIES TO RESTRICTIONS ON THE SETTING UP OF AGENCIES , BRANCHES OR SUBSIDIARIES BY NATIONALS OF ANY MEMBER STATE ESTABLISHED IN THE TERRITORY OF ANOTHER MEMBER STATE MUST BE REGARDED AS A SPECIFIC STATEMENT OF A GENERAL PRINCIPLE , APPLICABLE EQUALLY TO THE LIBERAL PROFESSIONS , ACCORDING TO WHICH THE RIGHT OF ESTABLISHMENT INCLUDES FREEDOM TO SET UP AND MAINTAIN , SUBJECT TO OBSERVANCE OF THE PROFESSIONAL RULES OF CONDUCT , MORE THAN ONE PLACE OF WORK WITHIN THE COMMUNITY .

3 . EVEN IN THE ABSENCE OF ANY DIRECTIVE COORDINATING NATIONAL PROVISIONS GOVERNING ACCESS TO AND THE EXERCISE OF THE LEGAL PROFESSION , ARTICLE 52 ET SEQ . OF THE EEC TREATY PREVENT THE COMPETENT AUTHORITIES OF A MEMBER STATE FROM DENYING , ON THE BASIS OF THE NATIONAL LEGISLATION AND THE RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT WHICH ARE IN FORCE IN THAT STATE , TO A NATIONAL OF ANOTHER MEMBER STATE THE RIGHT TO ENTER AND TO EXERCISE THE LEGAL PROFESSION SOLELY ON THE GROUND THAT HE MAINTAINS CHAMBERS SIMULTANEOUSLY IN ANOTHER MEMBER STATE .

Parties

IN CASE 107/83

REFERENCE TO THE COURT UNDER ARTICLE 177 OF THE EEC TREATY BY THE FRENCH COUR DE CASSATION ( COURT OF CASSATION ) FOR A PRELIMINARY RULING IN THE PROCEEDINGS PENDING BEFORE THAT COURT BETWEEN

ORDRE DES AVOCATS AU BARREAU DE PARIS ( THE PARIS BAR ASSOCATION )

AND

ONNO KLOPP , OF THE DUSSELDORF BAR ,

Subject of the case

ON THE INTERPRETATION OF ARTICLE 52 ET SEQ . OF THE EEC TREATY ,

Grounds

1 BY A JUDGMENT OF 3 MAY 1983 WHICH WAS RECEIVED AT THE COURT ON 6 JUNE 1983 , THE FRENCH COUR DE CASSATION ( COURT OF CASSATION ) REFERRED TO THE COURT FOR A PRELIMINARY RULING UNDER ARTICLE 177 OF THE EEC TREATY A QUESTION AS TO THE INTERPRETATION OF ARTICLE 52 ET SEQ . OF THE EEC TREATY IN RELATION TO ACCESS TO THE LEGAL PROFESSION .

2 THE QUESTION WAS RAISED IN PROCEEDINGS BETWEEN THE ORDRE DES AVOCATS AU BARREAU DE PARIS ( THE PARIS BAR ASSOCIATION ) AND MR KLOPP , A GERMAN NATIONAL AND A MEMBER OF THE DUSSELDORF BAR . MR KLOPP HAD APPLIED TO TAKE THE OATH AS AN AVOCAT AND TO BE REGISTERED FOR THE PERIOD OF PRACTICAL TRAINING AT THE PARIS BAR WHILST REMAINING A MEMBER OF THE DUSSELDORF BAR AND RETAINING HIS...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
14 cases
  • Akzo Nobel Chemicals Ltd and Akcros Chemicals Ltd v European Commission.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 29 April 2010
    ...103 TFEU). 131 – AM & S (cited in footnote 32, in particular paragraphs 18 and 22). 132 – See point 47 of this Opinion, above. 133 – Case 107/83 Klopp [1984] ECR 2971, paragraph 17; and Case C‑309/99 Wouters and Others [2002] ECR I‑1577, paragraph 99. 134 – See inter alia Case C‑279/93 Schu......
  • Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 4 July 2024.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 4 July 2024
    ...vom 19. Februar 2002, Wouters u. a. (C‑309/99, EU:C:2002:98, Rn. 99), unter Anführung der Urteile vom 12. Juli 1984, Klopp (107/83, EU:C:1984:270, Rn. 17), und vom 12. Dezember 1996, Reisebüro Broede (C‑3/95, EU:C:1996:487, Rn. 22 Meines Erachtens hindert nichts einen Mitgliedstaat daran, d......
  • The Queen v Secretary of State for Transport, ex parte Factortame Ltd and others.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 25 July 1991
    ...Officier van Justitie v. Kramer (Joined Cases 3/76, 4/76, 6/76) [1976] E.C.R. 1279, E.C.J. Ordre des Avocats au Barreau de Paris v. Klopp (Case 107/83) [1984] E.C.R. 2971, Pigs Marketing Board v. Redmond (Case 83/78) [1978] E.C.R. 2347, E.C.J. Reg. v. H.M. Treasury, Ex parte Daily Mail and ......
  • Opinion of Advocate General Medina delivered on 3 February 2022.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 3 February 2022
    ...et d’égalité de traitement « découlent » des articles 49 et 56 TFUE. 124 Voir, en ce sens, arrêts du 12 juillet 1984, Klopp (107/83, EU:C:1984:270, point 19), du 7 juillet 1988, Stanton et L’Étoile 1905 (143/87, EU:C:1988:378, point 11), du 29 avril 2004, Commission/Portugal (C‑171/02, EU:C......
  • Get Started for Free
5 books & journal articles
  • Neutralidad fiscal en la financiación de las empresas. El caso español
    • European Union
    • Estudios Tributarios Europeos No. 1-2010, March 2010
    • 1 March 2010
    ...por el juego de la libertad de establecimiento. La misma tiene efecto directo, como recordó la sentencia Klopp, de 12 de julio de 1984, as. C-107/8320. El Derecho Comunitario originario y, en concreto, el art. 43,2 del Tratado21 describe el alcance del derecho como la posibilidad de acceder......
  • La libre prestación de servicios y el derecho de establecimiento en el Derecho de la Unión Europea
    • European Union
    • La prestación de servicios de abogacía en el contexto del mercado interior de la Unión Europea
    • 10 October 2022
    ...Sentencia de 26 de noviembre de 1975, en el asunto Coenen, C-227/94, ECLI:EU:C:1991:301; Sentencia de 12 de julio de 1984, asunto Klopp, C-107/83, ECLI:EU:C:1983:971; Sentencia de 18 de julio de 2007, asunto Comisión v. Italia, C-134/95, ECLI:EU:C:2005:195; Sentencia de 7 de febrero de 2002......
  • Introducción
    • European Union
    • La prestación de servicios de abogacía en el contexto del mercado interior de la Unión Europea
    • 10 October 2022
    ...se suele agrupar el análisis de ambas libertades, lo cierto es que, el derecho de establecimiento y la libre 12 STCE de 12 de julio de 1984, C-107/83, asunto Ordre des avocats du barreau de Paris c. Onno Klopp, ECLI:EU:C:1984:270. 13 Sentencia del TJUE de 17 de julio de 2014, asuntos Angelo......
  • Fiscal neutrality in the financing of the companies. The Spanish case.
    • European Union
    • European Tax Studies No. 1-2010, March 2010
    • 1 March 2010
    ...principle of freedom of establishment. The freedom of establishment has a direct effect, as says the decision Klopp , of July 12, 1984, As. C-107/83 15 . The ECJ, as the European Union judicial organ, introduced the principle of direct effect of community law in Member States. The article 4......
  • Get Started for Free