Ministerul Administraţiei şi Internelor (MAI), Inspectoratul General al Poliţiei Române (IGPR) and Inspectoratul de Poliţie al Judeţului Tulcea (IPJ) v Corpul Naţional al Poliţiştilor - Biroul Executiv Central.
| Jurisdiction | European Union |
| Court | Court of Justice (European Union) |
| Writing for the Court | Lõhmus |
| ECLI | ECLI:EU:C:2012:288 |
| Date | 10 May 2012 |
| Docket Number | C‑134/12 |
| Procedure Type | Cuestión prejudicial - inadmisible |
Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 May 2012 —
Corpul Naţional al Poliţiştilor
(Case C‑134/12)
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — European Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms — Validity of national legislation imposing salary reductions on several categories of civil servants — Failure to give effect to European Union law — Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court of Justice
1. References for a preliminary ruling — Jurisdiction of the Court — Limits — Request for interpretation of the...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
11 cases
-
Cruciano Siragusa v Regione Sicilia — Soprintendenza Beni Culturali e Ambientali di Palermo.
...point 18; ordonnances du 1er mars 2011, Chartry, C-457/09, Rec. p. I-819, points 25 et 26; du 10 mai 2012, Corpul Naţional al Poliţiştilor, C‑134/12, point 15; du 7 février 2013, Pedone, C‑498/12, point 15, ainsi que du 7 novembre 2013, SC Schuster & Co Ecologic, C‑371/13, point 34 S’agissa......
-
Associazione Italiana delle Unità Dedicate Autonome Private di Day Surgery e dei Centri di Chirurgia Ambulatoriale (Aiudapds) v Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco (AIFA) and Ministero della Salute.
...du droit de l’Union (voir, en ce sens, arrêt Vandeweghe e.a., 130/73, EU:C:1973:131, point 2; ordonnances Corpul Naţional al Poliţiştilor, C‑134/12, EU:C:2012:288, point 14, ainsi que Petrus, C‑451/14, EU:C:2015:71, point 15). 23 Dans ces conditions, il convient de constater, sur le fondeme......
-
Grima Janet Nisttahuz Poclava v Jose María Ariza Toledano (Taberna del Marqués).
...e.a., 130/73, EU:C:1973:131, point 2; TNT Express Nederland, C‑533/08, EU:C:2010:243, point 61; ordonnance Corpul Naţional al Poliţiştilor, C‑134/12, EU:C:2012:288, point 14 ainsi que arrêt Qurbani, C‑481/13, EU:C:2014:2101, point 44 Il résulte de l’ensemble de ces considérations que la sit......
-
Rumyana Asenova Petrus v Republika Bulgaria.
...additionnel à la CEDH (voir, en ce sens, arrêt Vandeweghe e.a., 130/73, EU:C:1973:131, point 2; ordonnance Corpul Naţional al Poliţiştilor, C‑134/12, EU:C:2012:288, point 14, et arrêt Nisttahuz Poclava, C‑117/14, EU:C:2015:0000, point 43 et jurisprudence citée). 16 En ce qui concerne la Cha......
Get Started for Free
6 books & journal articles
-
Las actuales erosiones del estado de derecho en la unión europea
...de 2011, Corpul NaĠional al PoliĠiştilor (C-434/11, EU:C:2011:830) apdos. 14-15; de 10 de mayo de 2012, Corpul NaĠional al PoliĠiştilor (C-134/12, EU:C:2012:288); de 7 de marzo de 2013, Sindicato dos Bancários do Norte (C-128/12, EU:C:2013:149) apdos. 10-12; de 26 de junio de 2014, Sindicat......
-
Índice de jurisprudencia
...diciembre de 2011, Corpul NaĠional al PoliĠiştilor (C-434/11, EU:C:2011:830). Auto de 10 de mayo de 2012, Corpul NaĠional al PoliĠiştilor (C-134/12, EU:C:2012:288). Auto de 15 de noviembre de 2012, Städter (C-102/12 P, EU:C:2012:723). Auto del Tribunal General de 27 de noviembre de 2012, AD......
-
El régimen general de condicionalidad para la protección del presupuesto de la Unión Europea: ¿un mecanismo efectivo de garantía del estado de derecho en los estados miembros de la Unión Europea?
...AdministraĠiei şi Internelor (MAI) y otros, C-434/11, EU:C:2011:830. Auto del TJ. (2012). Corpul National al Politistilor, C-134/12, EU:C:2012:288. Auto del TJ. (2012). Corpul National al Politistilor y otros, C-369/12, EU:C:2012:725; Auto del TJ. (2013). Sindicato dos Bancarios do Norte y ......
-
El Tribunal de Justicia, centinela de la independencia judicial desde la sentencia Associação sindical dos juízes portugueses (ASJP)
...de trabajo justas y equitativas), todos de la CDFUE. 17. ATJ de 14 de diciembre de 2011, C-434/11, apartado 16; ATJ de 10 de mayo de 2012, C-134/12, apartado 13; ATJ de 15 de noviembre de 2012, C-369/12, apartado 15; ATJ de 7 de marzo de 2013, C-128/12, apartado 12; ATJ de 26 de junio de 20......
Get Started for Free