Hellmut Marschall v Land Nordrhein-Westfalen.

JurisdictionEuropean Union
Celex Number61995CJ0409
ECLIECLI:EU:C:1997:533
Date11 November 1997
CourtCourt of Justice (European Union)
Procedure TypeReference for a preliminary ruling
Docket NumberC-409/95
EUR-Lex - 61995J0409 - EN 61995J0409

Judgment of the Court of 11 November 1997. - Hellmut Marschall v Land Nordrhein-Westfalen. - Reference for a preliminary ruling: Verwaltungsgericht Gelsenkirchen - Germany. - Equal treatment of men and women - Equally qualified male and female candidates - Priority for female candidates - Saving clause. - Case C-409/95.

European Court reports 1997 Page I-06363


Summary
Parties
Grounds
Decision on costs
Operative part

Keywords

Social policy - Men and women - Access to employment and working conditions - Equal treatment - Derogations - Measures to promote equality of opportunity between men and women - Scope - National provision giving priority to the promotion of women over men where women have equal qualifications and are under-represented - Saving clause allowing an objective assessment of each individual case on the basis of criteria not discriminatory towards women - Whether permissible

(Council Directive 76/207, Art. 2(1) and (4))

Summary

A national rule which, in a case where there are fewer women than men at the level of the relevant post in a sector of the public service and both female and male candidates for the post are equally qualified in terms of their suitability, competence and professional performance, requires that priority be given to the promotion of female candidates unless reasons specific to an individual male candidate tilt the balance in his favour is not precluded by Article 2(1) and (4) of Directive 76/207 on the implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women as regards access to employment, vocational training and promotion, and working conditions, provided that:

- in each individual case the rule provides for male candidates who are equally as qualified as the female candidates a guarantee that the candidatures will be the subject of an objective assessment which will take account of all criteria specific to the candidates and will override the priority accorded to female candidates where one or more of those criteria tilts the balance in favour of the male candidate, and

- such criteria are not such as to discriminate against the female candidates.

Parties

In Case C-409/95,

REFERENCE to the Court under Article 177 of the EC Treaty by the Verwaltungsgericht Gelsenkirchen (Germany) for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that court between

Hellmut Marschall

and

Land Nordrhein-Westfalen

on the interpretation of Article 2(1) and (4) of Council Directive 76/207/EEC of 9 February 1976 on the implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women as regards access to employment, vocational training and promotion, and working conditions (OJ 1976 L 39, p. 40),

THE COURT,

composed of: G.C. Rodríguez Iglesias, President, C. Gulmann, H. Ragnemalm and M. Wathelet (Presidents of Chambers), G.F. Mancini, J.C. Moitinho de Almeida, P.J.G. Kapteyn (Rapporteur), J.L. Murray, D.A.O. Edward, J.-P. Puissochet, G. Hirsch, P. Jann and L. Sevón, Judges,

Advocate General: F.G. Jacobs,

Registrar: H.A. Rühl, Principal Administrator,

after considering the written observations submitted on behalf of:

- Land Nordrhein-Westfalen, represented by the Bezirksregierung Arnsberg, by Juliane Kokott, Professor at Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf,

- the Spanish Government, by Alberto José Navarro González, Director-General of Legal Coordination and Community Affairs, assisted by Gloria Calvo Díaz, Abogado del Estado, of the State Legal Service, acting as Agents,

- the French Government, by Catherine de Salins, Head of Subdirectorate in the Legal Directorate of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and Anne de Bourgoing, Chargé de Mission in the same directorate, acting as Agents,

- the Austrian Government, by Wolf Okresek, Ministerialrat in the Constitutional Service of the Federal Chancellor's Office, acting as Agent,

- the Finnish Government, by Tuula Pynnä, Legal Adviser at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, acting as Agent,

- the Swedish Government, by Lotty Nordling, Under-Secretary for Legal Affairs at the Department of Foreign Trade of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, acting as Agent,

- the United Kingdom Government, by Lindsey Nicoll, of the Treasury Solicitor's Department, acting as Agent, and by Eleanor Sharpston, Barrister,

- the Norwegian Government, by Beate B. Ekeberg, Head of Service acting for the Minister for Foreign Affairs, acting as Agent,

- the Commission of the European Communities, by Jürgen Grunwald, Legal Adviser, and Marie Wolfcarius, of its Legal Service, acting as Agents,

having regard to the Report for the Hearing,

after hearing the oral observations of Land Nordrhein-Westfalen, represented by Juliane Kokott; of the Netherlands Government, represented by Hans van den Oosterkamp, Legal Adviser at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, acting as Agent; of the Finnish Government, represented by Holger Rotkirch, Head of the...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
21 cases
  • Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 25 July 2018.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 25 July 2018
    ...de 2018, Egenberger (C‑414/16, EU:C:2018:257), apartado 68. 50 Véase, en este sentido, la sentencia de 11 de noviembre de 1997, Marschall (C‑409/95, EU:C:1997:533), apartado 31. 51 Véase el punto 100 de las presentes conclusiones. 52 Sentencias de 14 de julio de 1994, Faccini Dori (C‑91/92,......
  • Joseph Griesmar v Ministre de l'Economie, des Finances et de l'Industrie and Ministre de la Fonction publique, de la Réforme de l'Etat et de la Décentralisation.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 22 February 2001
    ...(C-158/97, Rec. I-1875). (11) - Sentencia de 17 de octubre de 1995 (C-450/93, Rec. p. I-3051). (12) - Sentencia de 11 de noviembre de 1997 (C-409/95, Rec. p. I-6363). (13) - Antes citada en la nota 10. (14) - Sentencia de 16 de septiembre de 1999 (C-218/98, Rec. p. I-5723). (15) - Citada en......
  • Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 10 September 2019.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 10 September 2019
    ...sentenza del 17 ottobre 1995, Kalanke (C‑450/93, EU:C:1995:322, punto 21). 63 V., in tal senso, sentenza dell’11 novembre 1997, Marschall (C‑409/95, EU:C:1997:533, punto 32), che non fa più riferimento all’obbligo di «interpretazione restrittiva», o sentenze del 19 marzo 2002, Lommers (C‑47......
  • Pedro Manuel Roca Álvarez v Sesa Start España ETT SA.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 6 May 2010
    ...101. 15 – Sentencias de 17 de octubre de 1995, Kalanke (C‑450/93, Rec. p. I‑3051), apartado 18; de 11 de noviembre de 1997, Marschall (C‑409/95, Rec. p. I‑6363), apartado 26, y de 19 de marzo de 2002, Lommers (C‑476/99, Rec. p. I‑2891), apartado 32. 16 – A este riesgo ya se refirió el Tribu......
  • Get Started for Free
4 books & journal articles
  • Equidad y principio de no discriminación en el pilar social europeo
    • European Union
    • La profundización de la unión económica y monetaria
    • 30 April 2019
    ...«Igualdad y no discriminación...», op. cit. 59 Sentencia de 11 de noviembre de 1997, Hellmut Marschall contra Land Nordrhein-Westfalen, C-409/95, EU:C:1997:533. 60 Sentencia de 6 de julio del 2000, Katarina Abrahamsson y Leif Anderson contra Elisabet Fogelqvist, C-407/98, EU:C:2000:367. 76 ......
  • Políticas de empleo por razón de género: ¿cómo combate la UE la brecha salarial?
    • European Union
    • El mercado único en la Unión Europea Medidas de sostenimiento del empleo en el marco europeo, Olga García Coca
    • 1 January 2019
    ...acceso al empleo o la promoción profesional del sexo menos representado destacando las SSTJCE de 11 de noviembre de 1997, Marschall , asunto C-409/95, apartado 33; de 6 de julio de 2000 Abrahamsson , asunto C-407/98, apartado 43; Mientras tanto, en la de 30 de septiembre de 2004, Briheche ,......
  • Positive action (article 5 Directive 2000/43, article 7 Directive 2000/78)
    • European Union
    • Country report non-discrimination. Transposition and implementation at national level of Council Directives 2000/43 and 2000/78: Germany 2020
    • 15 September 2020
    ...https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal- content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:61993CJ0450&from=DE ; Judgment of 11 November 1997, Marschall , C-409/95, EU:C:1997:533, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal- content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:61995CJ0409&from=GA ; Judgment of 6 July 2000, Abrahamsson and Anderson , C-......
  • Il principio di eguaglianza nel diritto dell'Unione europea alla luce della più recente giurisprudenza della Corte di giustizia in materia di assicurazioni
    • European Union
    • Studi sulla integrazione europea No. 3-2011, September 2011
    • 1 September 2011
    ...P. c. S. e Cornwall County Council , Raccolta , p. I-2143, punto 19. 7 V. sentenza della Corte di giustizia dell’11 novembre 1997, causa C-409/95, Marschall c. Land Nordrhein-Westfalen (Marschall) , Raccolta , p. I-6363, punto 29 s. Anche questo passaggio non è stato del tutto lineare: v. s......