Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany.

JurisdictionEuropean Union
ECLIECLI:EU:C:2004:235
CourtCourt of Justice (European Union)
Date29 April 2004
Docket NumberC-387/99
Procedure TypeRecurso por incumplimiento – fundado
Celex Number61999CJ0387
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
24 practice notes
  • E. Gavrielides Oy.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 23 September 2004
    ...– See Case 174/82 Sandoz [1983] ECR 2445, paragraph 18; see further Case C‑192/01 Commission v Denmark [2003] ECR I-9693, paragraph 45, Case C‑387/99 Commission v Germany [2004] ECR I-3751, paragraph 71, and Case C‑150/00 Commission v Austria [2004] ECR I-3887, paragraph 88. 29 – See Heijn ......
  • Commission of the European Communities v Portuguese Republic.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 22 January 2009
    ...communautaire présente un certain degré de constance et de généralité (voir, en ce sens, arrêts du 29 avril 2004, Commission/Allemagne, C-387/99, Rec. p. I-3751, point 42; du 26 avril 2005, Commission/Irlande, C-494/01, Rec. p. I‑3331, point 28, et du 27 avril 2006, Commission/Allemagne, pr......
  • European Commission v Italian Republic.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 5 September 2019
    ...presente un grado suficiente de continuidad y generalidad (véanse, en particular, las sentencias de 29 de abril de 2004, Comisión/Alemania, C‑387/99, EU:C:2004:235, apartado 28; de 26 de abril de 2005, Comisión/Irlanda, C‑494/01, EU:C:2005:250, apartado 28, y de 26 de abril de 2007, Comisió......
  • Hecht-Pharma GmbH v Staatliches Gewerbeaufsichtsamt Lüneburg.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 19 June 2008
    ...24 – Précitées à la note 13, point 44. 25 – Arrêts Commission/Allemagne (précité, point 55); du 29 avril 2004, Commission/Allemagne (C-387/99, Rec. p. I-3751, point 57); du 16 avril 1991, Upjohn (C-112/89, Rec. p. I-1703, point 23); du 20 mai 1992, Commission/Allemagne (C-290/90, Rec. p. I-......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
23 cases
  • Hecht-Pharma GmbH v Staatliches Gewerbeaufsichtsamt Lüneburg.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 19 June 2008
    ...24 – Précitées à la note 13, point 44. 25 – Arrêts Commission/Allemagne (précité, point 55); du 29 avril 2004, Commission/Allemagne (C-387/99, Rec. p. I-3751, point 57); du 16 avril 1991, Upjohn (C-112/89, Rec. p. I-1703, point 23); du 20 mai 1992, Commission/Allemagne (C-290/90, Rec. p. I-......
  • Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 3 December 2020.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 3 December 2020
    ...P, Ireland v Commission and Others, and C‑465/20 P, Commission v Ireland and Others. 28 Judgments of 29 April 2004, Commission v Germany (C‑387/99, EU:C:2004:235, paragraph 42), and of 26 April 2005, Commission v Ireland (C‑494/01, EU:C:2005:250, paragraph 29 Paragraph 90 of the judgment un......
  • Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta delivered on 7 April 2022.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 7 April 2022
    ...van Bennekom (227/82, EU:C:1983:354), vom 21. März 1991, Delattre (C‑369/88, EU:C:1991:137), vom 29. April 2004, Kommission/Deutschland (C‑387/99, EU:C:2004:235), vom 29. April 2004, Kommission/Österreich (C‑150/00, EU:C:2004:237), vom 9. Juni 2005, HLH Warenvertrieb und Orthica (C‑211/03, ......
  • Laboratoires Lyocentre v Lääkealan turvallisuus- ja kehittämiskeskus and Sosiaali- ja terveysalan lupa- ja valvontavirasto.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 30 May 2013
    ...Hecht‑Pharma, citada en la nota 31 de las presentes conclusiones, apartado 28, y jurisprudencia citada, y la sentencia Comisión/Alemania (C‑387/99), citada en la nota 34 de las presentes conclusiones, apartado 53, y jurisprudencia ( 42 ) Véase, por ejemplo, el artículo 21, apartado 4, de la......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Pluralism, Deference and the Margin of Appreciation Doctrine
    • European Union
    • European Law Journal No. 17-1, January 2011
    • 1 January 2011
    ...See, eg, Case C-36/02,Omega Spielhallen [2004] ECR I-9609; Case C-24/00, Commission v France (vitamins and caffeine) [2004]ECR I-1277; Case C-387/99, Commission v Germany (vitamin preparations) [2004] ECR I-3751; CaseC-463/01, Commission v Germany (German bottles) [2004] ECR I-11705; Case C......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT