Alfred Hirmann v Immofinanz AG.
Jurisdiction | European Union |
Court | Court of Justice (European Union) |
Date | 19 December 2013 |
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Second Chamber)
19 December 2013 ( *1 )
‛Reference for a preliminary ruling — Company law — Second Directive 77/91/EEC — Liability of a public limited liability company for breach of its obligations in respect of advertising — Inaccurate information in share prospectus — Extent of liability — Legislation of a Member State providing for repayment of the price paid by the purchaser for purchased shares’
In Case C‑174/12,
REQUEST for a preliminary ruling under Article 267 TFEU from the Handelsgericht Wien (Austria), made by decision of 26 March 2012, received at the Court on 12 April 2012, in the proceedings
Alfred Hirmann
v
Immofinanz AG,
intervening party:
Aviso Zeta AG,
THE COURT (Second Chamber),
composed of R. Silva de Lapuerta, President of the Chamber, J.L. da Cruz Vilaça (Rapporteur), G. Arestis, J.-C. Bonichot and A. Arabadjiev, Judges,
Advocate General: E. Sharpston,
Registrar: K. Malacek, Administrator,
having regard to the written procedure and further to the hearing on 17 April 2013,
after considering the observations submitted on behalf of:
— |
Mr Hirmann, by S. Ganahl and J. Moyal, Rechtsanwälte, |
— |
Immofinanz AG, by A. Zahradnik and B. Rieder, Rechtsanwälte, |
— |
Aviso Zeta AG, by A. Jank, Rechtsanwalt, |
— |
the Austrian Government, by A. Posch, acting as Agent, |
— |
the Portuguese Government, by L. Inez Fernandes and D. Tavares, acting as Agents, |
— |
the European Commission, by G. Braun and R. Vasileva, acting as Agents, |
after hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General at the sitting on 12 September 2013,
gives the following
Judgment
1 |
This request for a preliminary ruling concerns the interpretation of:
|
2 |
The request has been made in proceedings between Mr Hirmann and Immofinanz AG (‘Immofinanz’) concerning an application for the cancellation of an acquisition of shares in the latter. |
Legal context
European Union law
3 |
The fourth recital in the preamble to the Second Directive is worded as follows: ‘… Community provisions should be adopted for maintaining the capital, which constitutes the creditors’ security, in particular by prohibiting any reduction thereof by distribution to shareholders where the latter are not entitled to it and by imposing limits on the company’s right to acquire its own shares’. |
4 |
Articles 12, 15, 16, 18 to 20 and 42 of the Second Directive provide, inter alia: ‘Article 12 Subject to the provisions relating to the reduction of subscribed capital, the shareholders may not be released from the obligation to pay up their contributions. ... Article 15
…
… Article 16 Any distribution made contrary to Article 15 must be returned by shareholders who have received it if the company proves that these shareholders knew of the irregularity of the distributions made to them, or could not in view of the circumstances have been unaware of it. ... Article 18 1. The shares of a company may not be subscribed for by the company itself. … Article 19 1. Where the laws of a Member State permit a company to acquire its own shares, either itself or through a person acting in his own name but on the company’s behalf, they shall make such acquisitions subject to at least the following conditions:
… Article 20 1. Member States may decide not to apply Article 19 to: …
... Article 42 For the purposes of the implementation of this Directive, the laws of the Member States shall ensure equal treatment to all shareholders who are in the same position.’ |
5 |
Article 14(1) of the market abuse directive provides: ‘Without prejudice to the right of Member States to impose criminal sanctions, Member States shall ensure, in conformity with their national law, that the appropriate administrative measures can be taken or administrative sanctions be imposed against the persons responsible where the provisions adopted in the implementation of this Directive have not been complied [with]. Member States shall ensure that these measures are effective, proportionate and dissuasive.’ |
6 |
Recital 10 in the preamble to the prospectus directive states that the aim of that directive is to ensure investor protection and market efficiency. |
7 |
Articles 6 and 25(1) of the prospectus directive are worded as follows: ‘Article 6 Responsibility attaching to the prospectus 1. Member States shall ensure that responsibility for the information given in a prospectus attaches at least to the issuer or its administrative, management or supervisory bodies, the offeror, the person asking for the admission to trading on a regulated market or the guarantor, as the case may be. The persons responsible shall be clearly identified in the prospectus by their names and functions or, in the case of legal persons, their names and registered offices, as well as declarations by them that, to the best of their knowledge, the information contained in the prospectus is in accordance with the facts and that the prospectus makes no omission likely to affect its import. … Article 25 Sanctions 1. Without prejudice to the right of Member States to impose criminal sanctions and without prejudice to their civil liability regime, Member States shall ensure, in conformity with their national law, that the appropriate administrative measures can be taken or administrative sanctions be imposed against the persons responsible, where the provisions adopted in the implementation of this Directive have not been complied with. Member States shall ensure that those measures are effective, proportionate and dissuasive. …’ |
8 |
Articles 7, 17(1) and 28(1) of the transparency directive are worded as follows: ‘Article 7 Responsibility and liability Member States shall ensure that responsibility for the information to be drawn up and made public in accordance with Articles 4, 5, 6 and 16 lies at least with the issuer or its administrative, management or supervisory bodies and shall ensure that their laws, regulations and administrative provisions on liability apply to the issuers, the bodies referred to in this Article or the persons responsible within the issuers. ... Article 17 Information requirements for issuers whose shares are admitted to trading on a regulated market 1. . The issuer of shares admitted to trading on a regulated market shall ensure equal treatment for all holders of shares who are in the same position. ... Article 28 Penalties 1. Without prejudice to the right of Member States to impose criminal penalties, Member States shall ensure, in conformity with their national law, that at least the appropriate administrative measures may be taken or civil and/or... |
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 2 December 2021.
...54). 23 Judgment of 19 July 2016, Kotnik and Others (C‑526/14, EU:C:2016:570, paragraph 91). 24 See judgment of 19 December 2013, Hirmann (C‑174/12, EU:C:2013:856, paragraph 25 See Article 60(2)(b), in fine of Directive 2014/59. 26 That article provides that, ‘where it is necessary to prote......
-
Banco Santander, SA contra J.A.C. y M.C.P.R.
...responsabilità civile per le informazioni fornite nel prospetto, come interpretate dalla Corte nella sentenza del 19 dicembre 2013, Hirmann (C‑174/12, EU:C:2013:856), possano prevalere sui principi disciplinanti la risoluzione degli enti creditizi e delle imprese di investimento, introdotti......
-
Bankia SA v Unión Mutua Asistencial de Seguros (UMAS).
...Wirksamkeit der einschlägigen Bestimmungen des Unionsrechts sicherzustellen (vgl. entsprechend Urteil vom 19. Dezember 2013, Hirmann, C‑174/12, EU:C:2013:856, Rn. 46 Nach dem Äquivalenzgrundsatz dürfen die nationalen Verfahrensvorschriften, die dem Unionsrecht unterliegende Sachverhalte reg......
-
Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 11 February 2021.
...bis 33 und Tenor). 9 Urteil vom 26. Juni 2019, Craeynest u. a. (C‑723/17, EU:C:2019:533, Rn. 54 und die dort angeführte Rechtsprechung). 10 C‑174/12, EU:C:2013:856, Rn. 40 und die dort angeführte 11 C‑174/12, EU:C:2013:856. 12 Urteil vom 19. Dezember 2013, Hirmann (C‑174/12, EU:C:2013:856, ......
-
Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 2 December 2021.
...point 54). 23 Arrêt du 19 juillet 2016, Kotnik e.a. (C‑526/14, EU:C:2016:570, point 91). 24 Voir arrêt du 19 décembre 2013, Hirmann (C‑174/12, EU:C:2013:856, point 25 Voir article 60, paragraphe 2, sous b), in fine, de la directive 2014/59. 26 Cet article dispose que, « [l]orsqu’il est néce......
-
Banco Santander, SA contra J.A.C. y M.C.P.R.
...responsabilità civile per le informazioni fornite nel prospetto, come interpretate dalla Corte nella sentenza del 19 dicembre 2013, Hirmann (C‑174/12, EU:C:2013:856), possano prevalere sui principi disciplinanti la risoluzione degli enti creditizi e delle imprese di investimento, introdotti......
-
Bankia SA v Unión Mutua Asistencial de Seguros (UMAS).
...di preservare l’efficacia delle disposizioni di diritto dell’Unione applicabili (v., per analogia, sentenza del 19 dicembre 2013, Hirmann, C‑174/12, EU:C:2013:856, punto 46 Il principio di equivalenza esige che le disposizioni procedurali nazionali che disciplinano situazioni soggette al di......
-
Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 11 February 2021.
...bis 33 und Tenor). 9 Urteil vom 26. Juni 2019, Craeynest u. a. (C‑723/17, EU:C:2019:533, Rn. 54 und die dort angeführte Rechtsprechung). 10 C‑174/12, EU:C:2013:856, Rn. 40 und die dort angeführte 11 C‑174/12, EU:C:2013:856. 12 Urteil vom 19. Dezember 2013, Hirmann (C‑174/12, EU:C:2013:856, ......